English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why the Western media is always betraying their public about the deeds what their politicians are doing all around the world. just through creating false perception they are trying to proove that muslims are terrorists??? Cant their public see that the real terrorists are their LEADERS themselves? Thay first attack the muslims and kill their children, women, old people through attacking direct on their residential areas and when they reply back they call them terrorists. Oh God how much sick they are!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AND THIS IS HAPPENING THROUGHT THE CENTURIES.

2006-08-16 08:13:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

DITTO to Ju Encarn above.Let me add this though;
The" first attack " came when Muslims with swords in hand went out of mecca invading many lands an forcing conversions to Islam. After numerous generations the products of this rape and pillaging have been brainwashed to believe they have made the decision uncoerced to follow alla.
The western media is far from perfect but are you able to find a better example in any Islamic country?. Didn't the Taliban completely sever the heads of even women for expressing a dissenting view. Please save yourself from the ignorance you may have. I truly feel sorry for you. I want you to live free inside and out. Happy as much as possible.
If you disagree with my position I still wish you the best as long as you don't blow yourself up in front of innocent civilians.

2006-08-16 08:41:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree that the western media probably portrays issues in a certain light and not always from all sides. But they have bosses to answer to and they have stockholders to answer to and they have politicians to answer to so what can we expect.

It is true that all Muslims are not terrorists, but it is also true that all terrorists are Muslims.

If you don't like this media portrayal, I would suggest that the Muslim population demand that their governments and religious leaders go public, with the media and publicly denounce terrorism and Muslims that associate their selves with this instead of remaining silent for the most part. They should demand that their governments arrest and exile suspected terrorists and members of their organizations. Silence is interpreted as passive acceptance or agreement.

2006-08-16 08:30:29 · answer #2 · answered by cj 4 · 0 0

>>>attacking direct on their residential areas<<<

That's because the terrorists like to deliberately hide in residential areas, using the residents as human shields.

And, when the inevitable attack comes and the civilians who are in the way accidentally get hurt or killed, the terrorists can then score "pity points" in the court of public opinion -- just like you are trying to do now.

Sorry, but I think any reasonably informed person can see through this con game.

2006-08-16 08:22:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I had heard that Muslims carry over their grievances for 500 years. My advice stop killing and get over it.
9/11 killed women and children and babies. No one was bothering them until they did that.
They went into Kuwait and killed women and children and no one was bothering them. Gulf War.
What about the horn of Africa? They won the war and continued the fighting. Darfur. Still starving to death millions of innocent women and children and America isn't involved.
Can't blame them there. 3 fractions of Muslims are fighting.
Leader Joseph Kony self proclaimed prophet and mystic.
Minni, arcua, Minnawi all Muslims.
They have kidnapped 25,000 Children the girls they use as sex slaves and the boys they train to fight. That was even on aljazera a muslim News agency.
tens of thousands have been killed by them mostly civilians.
2 million displaced they are keeping aid from so they can slowly starve to death. The UN international court declared amnesty for the groups if they would just stop killing they said no.
The felt anyone who didn't believe in Allah should die.
No allowance for converts either Won't even come to the peace talks they want to fight each other.
You might find this interesting most muslims who have been killed have been killed by other muslims. That was on Al jazera.
Not an american news agency

2006-08-16 08:31:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

US definition of terrisots: 1.) One whom defends himself when we come into their land 2.) A lie we made up so we can renew our resources 3.) A muslim whom resists Zionist 4.) IA religion whom must people don't know about so will make a good target
5) the mideast 6) Anyone whom expresses how evil we are 7) A person whom looks middle eastern and wears a turban.
8) Someone whom is not American 9) A word used to control the ignorant American population 10) Anything having to do with the middle east 11) a country with oil that doesn't want to give it to us

2006-08-16 08:29:47 · answer #5 · answered by Muse 4 · 0 0

It is true that many media organizations in the West (Europe and N.America) give a very incomplete picture of what is happening. I would not say they project lies. Terrorism certainly exists. But they may not give the full picture.
Having said that, ask yourself, are media in Islamic nations any better? Do the media in Islamic nations always project the 'right' picture? Islamic nations in middle east, until recently did not even have free press, but only state controlled media who were frankly, telling fairy-tales. Al -Jazeera is a welcome change.

Media in the middle east give an incomplete picture because they are largely state controlled and are allowed to give only biased views. Media in the 'West' gives incomplete picture because they are owned by certain groups and depending upon who own the media, the coverage differs.

The truth is, we live in a world where we are surrounded by all kinds of opinions and media coverage. If we really want to get at the truth, it is we who have to decide to analyse things in an unbiased way and make-up our mind after carefull consideration. In other words, we can get information from all those media organisations. But we have to apply thought and think for ourselves. We must not depend upon others to think for us and give us an unbiased opinion.

2006-08-16 08:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by Maverick 2 · 0 0

They ar eliberal and can't help but do it the truth is irrelevant to them they just want to be right it is a form of insanity.

2006-08-16 08:21:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because they fear to face reality. see the links below:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/160806buyscakes.htm
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1102.shtml
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1106.shtml
http://www.onlinejournal.com/

and these are all just a drop of the reality.

2006-08-16 08:22:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers