English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Guess it would make it to easy to check if hackers broke into the machines.

2006-08-16 06:16:37 · 6 answers · asked by jackie 6 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

How do you feel about that?

2006-08-16 06:17:31 · update #1

6 answers

why would they be against it?

2006-08-16 06:21:18 · answer #1 · answered by Dwight D J 5 · 0 1

We have the electronic balots where I live. They are so easy to use and I like them. After your vote has been submited a paper recipt prints into a locked container which is see through, so you can see your vote.

I think the real reason states states oppose this is because it means they would have to spend money and update their systems, and train their employees.

2006-08-16 16:01:29 · answer #2 · answered by East of Eden 4 · 0 1

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. CITE YOUR SOURCE. I have yet to hare any such claim. Considering the sheer number of complaints about anything election related, I doubt it would be missed is true.

2006-08-16 21:40:06 · answer #3 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

I voted on an lever machine and didn't get a receipt, so why should I get one now?

2006-08-16 13:21:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Less paper less work,

poor security no real election,

no real trade of paper is required.

2006-08-16 13:21:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

read www.JeanValjeanLives.com

2006-08-16 13:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers