Is the war in Iraq now a civil war problem between the Shiites and the Sunnis, with the U.S. standing watch?
2006-08-16 05:07:31 · 11 answers · asked by David B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The war was over when Saddam was captured , Now , it's staying there long enough to Prevent a civil war and let their government get up to speed.
You have terrorist insurgents coming from all over the middle east wanting a peice of the oil pie ,.
Do you really want Syria Or Iran to maybe gain control ?
By the way , WE WON THE WAR .
NOW ,IT"S PEACEKEEPING !
2006-08-16 05:23:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I' rather darn specific there wasn't an go out strategies-set! We went in with the assumption of triumphing in the different case, we knew we had to win so we could no longer go out & desire they does not come calling; they declared the conflict on us, keep in mind? the two Germany & Japan had to be defeated or they might have attacked us here. We felt it a extra advantageous option to combat them there! i'm specific that shall we are transforming into our troops out, if we actually had to yet, i do no longer think of that became into ever a real attention. An go out strategies-set isn't something that we seem to ever plan forward; we unquestionably did no longer have one in the two Korea or Vietnam! we don't have one for Iraq the two, even nevertheless we communicate approximately bringing our troops residing house, no person yet has arise with any plan of ways we are to do it!
2016-10-02 04:05:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure there will ever be an exit strategy because then people and/or the government could be held accountable.
No, this is NOT a winnable war.
These are two kids fighting over dad's inheritance. Have you ever had a fight with someone over $$$. Does anybody EVER win???
2006-08-16 05:24:42 · answer #3 · answered by pamspraises 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should use the same exit strategy we employed in Germany and Japan during WWII. Defeat them, accept only unconditional surrender and stick around to make sure they don't magically rearm.
2006-08-19 06:17:40 · answer #4 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is, Bush just rushed in and got over his head. There is no criteria by which we can measure success, declare "victory" and withdraw. One reason for this could be that the Administration has no intention of ever totally withdrawing.
2006-08-16 05:15:16 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. October 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exit Strategy? Lol thats not hard, take a seat in a military transport and wave bye-bye to Iraq. Doesn't take a rocket scientist.
2006-08-16 05:14:31 · answer #6 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We have helped them build a government and once the Iraqi military is strong enough to hold its on. I would consider that "winning".
2006-08-16 06:36:05 · answer #7 · answered by Curt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First we need to know what winning is.
If you think we don't need an exit strategy go join the army or marines! do it for your country.
2006-08-16 05:14:52 · answer #8 · answered by john p 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
U.S. is there UNTIL it's sure there's no further advantages of being in Iraq...
it wasn't their buisness before the war...why do you thing they care now?
2006-08-16 05:13:26 · answer #9 · answered by Diablous 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If we pull out, all those bastards in the middle east will just claim victory, like cowards they dont come out and fight but yet they feel as if they defeated someone.
2006-08-16 05:14:26 · answer #10 · answered by Hammer 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋