2006-08-16 04:57:58 · 46 answers · asked by A Baby Ate My Dingo 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry to hear about your dingo
2006-08-16 05:11:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If God "made" you barren then you may have an argument. But how are you supposed to find out whether it was God, or just something that happened? I don't think that God has chosen to make many people barren, and if he did I'm going to say that he can stop this person from adopting as well. I don't see any sin in trying to adopt, ever (unless you know for certain that you're not supposed to have kids).
2006-08-16 05:16:08 · answer #2 · answered by pelotahombre 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God doesn't make women barren. The circumstances of this world do. Children are a blessing from God, and adoption is not a sin.
2006-08-16 05:05:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think if you god made your barren it could be for the reason that he wants you to adopt. Theres lots of kids out there that need good, loving homes. Adoption is never a sin!
2006-08-16 05:03:21 · answer #4 · answered by farmergyrl23 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it a sin then to wear glasses, if your eye is not capable to see things with clarity?
In my personal view disease were created so that we may overcome them, as the good Lord has equipped us with the ability to overcome them and rise, using his God given abilities of reason, logic and ability to acquire and organize knowledge.
If a person is wounded, should he not use medicine and allow the natural system to heal it slowly?
Adoption however has nothing to do with being barren or not being barren. Adoption should be done with the purpose of helping out someone who needs help. In Islam it is not allowed to adopt a child and give the child your name, while eradicating the name and family context of the adopted child.
We are required to keep the child's name, treat the child in justice and mercy, perhaps showing her or him more kindness than your own children, but always be aware and make the child know that he or she is adopted, without making that child feel out of place.
An adopted child also never takes the place of your real child in our faith, as it would be unfair to take the rights of your own child and give them away. However, you are allowed to gift the adopted child from what you have.
I hope this makes sense.
2006-08-16 05:14:08 · answer #5 · answered by NQV 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHO THE HELL TOLD YOU THAT?
Firstly, who said there is a god?
Secondly, it is simply a birth defect or fertility problem, much like autism or bad eyesight, no-one is born perfect.
Thirdly, How dare you even suggest that adoption is a sin, We adopted a 3 week old girl from Sri Lanka, 16 years ago. what a fantastic girl she is now, how lucky WE were, there are far too many Unwanted kids in this world, and far too many childless couples, through no fault of either.
Do NOT pick this as your best answer, you do not deserve the points.
2006-08-16 05:08:40 · answer #6 · answered by wheelrim 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God gave you freewill because he lacks the power to control you. If you can't have children it is because your DNA is defective and shouldn't be passed on to the next generation. It has nothing to do with your parenting skills. If god made you barren, can you still work at a day care center raising other peoples children? Yes.
2006-08-16 05:05:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a reason why you cannot have children. But God would never deny you of adopting children. That may be your calling from him. It is not a sin to adopt.
2006-08-16 05:03:52 · answer #8 · answered by Snuffy Smith 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever happens, happens for a good reason. if someone is barren, it means GOD has decided something special for that person. HE may wants the person to adopt an orphan, or someone who did not get proper love, or it may even be that we may not be able to handle parentship!! so remember everything happens for a purpose. you may not know it now, but surely will know it later. FYI, adoption is not a sin. its just the opposite. it gives you blessings, for giving love to someone who has lost it for no reasons of their own!
2006-08-16 05:08:47 · answer #9 · answered by CuriosCAT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a lot of extrapolation with little evidence to support your theory.
I'd suggest that a barren woman wasn't meant to have her own children, but instead was intended to choose a child without parents (adoption) to love instead, if she so decided.
2006-08-16 05:02:27 · answer #10 · answered by lily 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting question, but I have to say the barren woman was meant for adopting. She cannot produce her own child but she is capable of loving and caring for one she should take care of a child who has no mother and home.
2006-08-16 05:07:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋