I posed a similar question a few weeks ago, only my question was about their "experts". The IDiots and Creatinists claim that the background is irrelevant, out of convenience, and refuse to explain why they cite non-natural science "experts". As well as continuing to claim that they can not and have not published in peer reviewed scientific journals because they do not want to. It is actually because their "scientific work" is FAULTY and invalid.
2006-08-15 22:49:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most creationists are too busy protesting their religious beliefs to do serious study of the issues. There are a few who do study them, superficially, but nevertheless get it wrong. The ultimate test for a creationist is: what, using the theory, can you correctly predict? The answer: nothing. (That's provable.) But the evolutionists use that theory to make useful predictions in many fields.
2006-08-15 20:56:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Scientific background: College education. Some personal research. Education: College Degree Journals and Books: Yes. Analytical research into evolution, Yes and No. Of many points, yes, but only enough to know the whole thing has big missing gaps, and lots has been refuted, and yet is passed over.
2006-08-15 20:53:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by sweetie_baby 6
·
1⤊
7⤋
The people who are promoting that agenda are not even specialists in the area, so how can we expect supporters to be more educated than their so called "experts."
This link is very revealing about the true nature of "Intelligent Design" and its current supporters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Science_and_Culture
What is amazing is how they have no problem telling lies to support their arguments. Must be those "absolute morals" they claim to have.
2006-08-15 20:57:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
If evolution happened, then we are all accidents anyway and even your reasoning is futile.......your are able to ask such a question because of the unique inquiring ability God gave the brain you have.
My degree is in the obvious..........just look around. Did all the pieces of your car just one day decide to jump together and make themselves into a car? No, it is an intelligent machine and required intelligent beings to design and build it. You, I and this entire complicated cosmos are much more complicated and intelligent. Intelligent design requires an intelligent designer.
2006-08-15 21:10:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by nightcricket 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
Recreational science buff. I have a B.A. in Accounting/ Finance.
I will be working on my Master's in the very near future.
My main quarrel is with evolutionists who want me to be that high-level information (example: how to build a particle accelerator) can just pop up out of nowhere. Of course, even the DNA of the "simplest" of organisms contain levels of information vastly greater than the instructions for how to build a particle accelerator.
High-level information requires, by the very nature of what it is, a high-level intellect.
Information Theory will be the death of evolution. Information is neither matter, nor energy. Therefore, it cannot originate or evolve from either. Matter and energy can convey information, but the energy and matter are not the information itself.
2006-08-15 20:50:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Adyghe Ha'Yapheh-Phiyah 6
·
0⤊
7⤋
Why do you defend a theory? That is just what it is; a theory. The theorist himself started to doubt himself and that is written in his journals.
2006-08-15 21:06:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by ByHisGrace 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
You know half of them will lie and say they did, then turn around and say that evolution means that man evolved from apes.
2006-08-15 20:49:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by holidayspice 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
are you an evolutionist? if so have you really read about the flimsy evidences that evolution relies upon?
anyway, i'm a physics major and i AM for Intelligent Design.
Mind you i didn't just wake up one morning and decide i'm gonnas side with intelligent design.
2006-08-15 20:54:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by >ScouT< 2
·
0⤊
7⤋
In other words, nothing. As expected.
2006-08-15 20:55:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scott M 7
·
1⤊
3⤋