if you now can not take liquids on a flight how come is a safety issue you can take on a train or bus?

Question

so is a life on a plain worth more than one on a bus

so is a life on a plain worth more than one on a bus or train

eamy thats wy the world says america has not got a clue what is going on out side.
did you never hear of the london attack on bus and train you silly thing you

last comment is for army wife

so clara the bus stops out side he citys and wvery one walks in i presume you daft brush you

sky high gets wanker of the week award
so you can not bring a bottle of aftershave on a jet. but you can take a rucksack full of 2 lr bottles descised as cola on a train or bus, wake up to thequestion you tosser

Answer 1

No, it's not an American problem, dipshit. You can't blow a bus out of the sky. Buses do not transit across continents. Buses do not cross the Pacific Ocean.

And it it spelled PLANE not PLAIN genius.

I got your wanker right here, you ignorant little twit. Learn how to spell, then you are entitled to your assanine opinions. I thought you Brits were somewhat intelligent, maybe you were dropped on your head repeatedly as a child.

And cola is not a clear liquid, Einstein.

Answer 2

well, a bus in London, that's someting
blowing up a greyhound out in the plains is not all that prime-time-TV-worthy, why would someone bother dying to be a footnote?
plus, the price of a bus ticket does not allow for an army of security guards to pat every passenger down...

Answer 3

Because in a plane you can't just drop things out the window!

Answer 4

probably because it hasn't hit a terrorist's mind to use buses and trains as weapons of mass destruction yet--also a plane is INTERNATIONAL, i.e. they can board in britain and fly to the u.s.
that's certainly something you can't do on a bus!

Answer 5

BECAUSE YOU CAN DO MORE DAMAGE IN A PLANE.