Actually if someone wished to take the time one could count to a billion. I think I'll keep my views on Jesus of Nazareth and the bible thanks.
2006-08-15 11:22:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by genaddt 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Athaists can u explein one question:rediation from stars billiones of light-years way raeching us...explain.'?
No one cans count to a billione, so how is that we knows the stars r billiones of light years away? Do not u see the folly of those ignorent scientistcs?? How come you not beleve the truths of Bible and Jesus now?
2006-08-18 11:23:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cartman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Atheists, can you explain one question: How can radiation from stars billions of light-years away reach us?...Please explain!
No one can count to a billion, so how can we know the stars are billions of light years away? Do you not see the folly of ignorant scientists?? How come you do not believe the truths of Bible and Jesus now?
See, a little editing and you don't sound half as stupid. Now the next time you want to post a question just copy and paste this one and insert whatever little tid bit of wisdom you would like.
And really it's more like trillions of light years away.
2006-08-15 11:35:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by nonameforme 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No - maybe you can't count to a billion, just like you can't spell.
I, and many people I know, can count to a billion. The limitation is not the intellectual ability, but the time that is required to count by 1's, as is 1, 2, 3 ... (can you count that high?). But if you counted by hundreds, or thousands, or millions, then you'd cut that time substantially.
And the U.S. government is very familiar with the concept of a "billion" because that's about how many dollars are spent in the current war in Iraq every single week.
And aren't you the one making argument about mathematical proofs proving the Trinity? Now you suggest that numbers are no good? Blimey.
2006-08-15 11:50:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Apparently you have a hard time understanding my last few posts. Science is based only on observations and the ability to repeat them in a controlled scenario, basically controlled assumptions. Now to say that all scientists are ignorant and don't believe a god exists is quite presumptuous. I believe in a heaven, Jesus as my savior and a hell, but I also believe everything has a rational explanation. Does this contradict, It may in some areas, but that isn't the point. If you really cared about gods words, wouldn't you want to help other individuals for the cause of humanity rather than bother them with questions that only pertain truly to your concerns. Any way, here are some reading material that suggests that science and beliefs actually coexist.
2006-08-16 09:36:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Elliot K 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I actual desire you're a troll, because of the fact if there is anybody available who's relatively that ignorant, i might get heavily depressed. the only way shall we be receiving radiation from stars billions of sunshine years away could be that the universe is billions of years old. in actuality, that's actual attempting to argue that in spite of is the farthest we are able to "see" (with gadgets, of direction) is a demonstration of how old the universe rather is. As to the thought that "no you will count variety to a thousand million," computers actual can. and plenty larger numbers, too.
2017-01-04 05:59:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umm... Are you implying that God made it so? Hmm. Interesting.
Well, if you must know, here's the Physical Equation.
The energy produced by stars, as a by-product of nuclear fusion, radiates into space as both electromagnetic radiation and particle radiation. The particle radiation emitted by a star is manifested as the stellar wind (which exists as a steady stream of electrically charged particles (such as free protons, alpha particles, and beta particles) emanating from the star’s outer layers) and as a steady stream of neutrinos emanating from the star’s core.
The production of energy at the core is the reason why stars shine so brightly: every time two or more atomic nuclei of one element fuse together to form an atomic nucleus of a new heavier element deep inside the core of a star, photons of electromagnetic energy are released from the nuclear fusion reaction, which are then converted to visible light in the star’s outer layers.
The peak frequency and color of the visible light depends on the temperature of the star’s outer layers, including its photosphere. Besides visible light, stars also emit forms of electromagnetic radiation that are invisible to the human eye. In fact, stellar electromagnetic radiation spans across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from the longest wavelengths of radio waves and infrared to the shortest wavelengths of ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays. All components of stellar electromagnetic radiation, both visible and invisible, are typically significant.
Also, here is the equation determining thus previously said:
L=4(pi)R^2(gamma)T^4subcript(e); R being the stellar radius and T being the temperature.
2006-08-15 11:31:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
...huh...? I could count to a billion easily, it would just take a while. I could count to 14.7 billion as well. The measurements are based on parallax and triangulation with nearer bodies. If that doesn't make sense to you I'm not surpised, you would have to learn how to count first...
2006-08-15 11:54:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kenny ♣ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No one can count to a billion, and I seriously doubt you can count higher than 10 (20 if you're using your toes)
2006-08-15 11:21:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by koresh419 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Chuck Norris has counted to infinity... twice. This proves the scientists are correct.
P.S. Chuck Norris has round house kicked people with better grammar and spelling than yourself. Be warned.
2006-08-15 11:27:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by jewan 2
·
3⤊
0⤋