Both seem pretty damn batty. One in that fundamentalist propaganda way and the other in a iron fist secrecy kind of way, but who is crazier? And who will ultimately lead to their country's demise?
2006-08-15 07:52:06 · 17 answers · asked by Maiman13 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Ahmadinejad for sure; he's threatened to "wipe Israel off the map" and funnels weapons to terrorists. If he had any major weapons, WWIII would already be in full swing.
.... and seriously people, whether you like or dislike him G.W. Bush is most definitely not a dictator. Put your politics aside for the good of the country for once.
2006-08-15 07:56:33 · answer #1 · answered by baq2calli 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The thing about Ahmadinejad is that he is not in total control of Iran. That power rests with the Ayatollah, whose religious authority trumps any other government body. Normally I would object to this, but it seems the Ayatollah is a good deal more moderate the the president, so we're relatively safe from Ahmadinejad's craziness for the moment.
North Korea has stayed relatively out of the headlines recently. I can't say much for it.
As for who is crazier, I'd still go with Ahmadinejad. He's all wacky religious, whereas Kim Jong Il just wants power and influence, which is a perfectly reasonable ambition, even if his means of going about it make the rest of the world uneasy.
2006-08-15 15:03:58 · answer #2 · answered by knivetsil 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Jong. His actions show that he pretty much hates his constituents--starving them, etc. Ahmadinejad loves his people, and loves the truth. If anyone is "crazy", it is the people who do not understand that Iranians have souls. If Israel is successful in compelling my country (the USA) into starting a war with the Iranians, especially considering that their leader is Ahmadinejad, who stands up for our rights and reputation more than our own so-called "leaders" do, I hope we lose. But you are a slave to Zionist interests and won't understand until they provoke someone into giving you a grotesque death.
2006-08-15 15:09:45 · answer #3 · answered by Romeo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't count on them being crazy, they are crazy like foxes. Did you see Amadinejad on 60 minutes yesterday? If it's on as a rerun it's worth watching. He's very quick and made some good points -- it's easy to believe that he's won the support of the Iranian people and will keep it. He seems like someone who could outwit Rice and Hadley in negotiations, so maybe it is best that they don't respond to his requests to talk.
2006-08-15 15:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by TxSup 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think the muslim is crazier because he is motivated by a crazy religious dogma. He would fight you the death. The Korean is also very crazy, but he is more power hunger than fanatical. I think he would give up easily if the world went after him.
2006-08-15 15:02:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both are bad. Hard to tell which is worst, but the Prez from Iran is really ignorant and cocky. Needs to be done in or gotten rid of. also Kim Jong Illneeds to go
2006-08-15 15:02:29 · answer #6 · answered by beakman57 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nooooooo
The crazier is Jose Luis Rodriguez zapatero, the spanishi prime ministre.He is absolutelly crazy. He is friend of fidel castro, ETA, Ben laden, he is enemy of bush, israel, NATO...
He is the crazier
2006-08-16 10:50:02 · answer #7 · answered by alvarogares2001 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kim Jong II is definitely the more erratic of the two.
Iran's political agenda is craftier than it seems. They are seeking hegemony in the region, but no Armageddon that would destroy their own ambitions.
2006-08-15 15:03:34 · answer #8 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They are both equally a drag to world peace
2006-08-15 14:59:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
neither. But the one to watch is Amadinejad.
He will use a nuke. No question. He is taking orders from below.
2006-08-15 14:57:42 · answer #10 · answered by smitty031 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋