Research more useful?

Question

Have you read trough this research about all mankind and society also religion?
http://www.harunyahya.com/articles/20questions02.php

Answer 1

Look, I read it, and I have to agree; it's complete and utter bunk. It's entirely prejudiced and not meant to be a dispassionate analysis of the subject at all. Many of its claims may seem convincing on the surface, but only if the person has no knowledge of the subject already. People like this are dangerous because they have just enough scientific knowledge to sound credible but not enough to make valid arguments. It's true that evolution is a scientic theory and has not been proven, but then scientific theories can NEVER be proven, only corroborated. But then scientists will admit that, which really shows their integrity and lack of bias. You won't notice creationists admitting they could be wrong, for example, even though there is far less evidence that their theory is correct. If you'd like to learn more about evolution from a slightly less biased source, you might try this PBS website; it's informative, yet concise: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/cat01.html#Q02 ,

Answer 2

I read the first paragraph of that article and realized it is bullshit. Ask a scientist (a real one, not some toolbox with a PHD in something that has nothing to do with evolutionary science) what they think of that... they will laugh at you.

Evolution is not a religion as people like Kent Hovind would like you to believe. These people use junk science to vilify evolution and try to pry it free of the scientific community in the minds of theists as to fallibly prop up their own creationist agendas which seem to stem from an irrational fear.

That, my friend, is not research... it's garbage.