English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The global war on terror as called by G. Busch
Is a physical and ideological war. But I’ve seen that governments are try to fight an ideological war attacking only the physical aspect of it.
Wouldn’t be a better strategy to fight and or change the international politics and actions that have caused so much hate towards world super powers?

2006-08-15 03:19:11 · 17 answers · asked by heraclemaya 2 in Politics & Government Military

17 answers

Mid-east and central Asian cultures have loved to hate each other for millenia. It has nothing to do with being Arabic. Try Serbs and Slovaks.

Muslim cultures add another element: they resent that the US is the source of so much pressure on their youth through TV, movies, radio, music, magazines and the internet to do and say things they find blasphemous at worst and morally harmful at best.

What would you do to protect your children? The hysteria in this country over "child molesters" is the same emotion Muslims feel about "morality molesters."

2006-08-15 03:32:56 · answer #1 · answered by thylawyer 7 · 0 0

It is writen in the Us constitution, that to do the war, you must declare war to a Nation, and "terror" is not a Nation...

Sorry, I really think Bush an dothers are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World Order, and the Martial Law !

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

The Bush's helped finance the Waffen SS and SA.
The Bush family has had dealings with Saddam Hussein involving oil drilling and real estate.
The Bush family has connections to the Bin Laden family. This includes a close partnership in the Carlyle group and Arbusto oil. The Bin Ladens and the Bush's have had a long close relationship.
However I don't know if they actually had money taken away being the Bush family has been known to bribe politicians.
t's funny how the Bush family has business dealings with people and governments who kill Americans. The people who are the biggest threat to our national security are friends and partners with the Bush's.
Makes you wonder who's side the Bush's are on.http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...

2006-08-15 10:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 1 1

When you get up in the morning, the first thing you should do is look in a mirror. The person looking back at you is the person who is causing you all the trouble you have. Once you have established that fact, you can arise and go about doing whatever you do.

STOP LOOKING FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO BLAME. If you keep trying to shift responsibility, you will never solve neither your problem or the world's problem.

You are responsible for who was elected to ALL offices, town, city, state or federal. You are responsible for the rules, regulations and laws that group of people enacted. You are the one who allows those rules, regulations and laws to go un-inforced by local, regional and national "cronies, brothers-in-laws and political hacks."

There is no way you can get away from the fact that YOUR inaction, YOUR deliberately not seeing, YOUR cheating on your taxes, YOUR everything involvement is at the roots of YOU village, town, city, state and national problem.

How many times do we have to be told that here in America, WE, THE PEOPLE are the cause of all of our benefits and problems. Whatever happens is OUR fault.

Now, once again, GET OFF YOUR A** AND DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

2006-08-15 11:23:06 · answer #3 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 0 0

I agree with what most have said here, the Arabic people in general have been at war to some degree for over a thousand years! It would be impossible to convince them to cease military action, it's all they know. The younger generation seems to be opening up to political change, but the hard liners are not as open to change. We need to perfect our security structure here stateside, leave them to their own devices. If they want to war for another 2000 years, let them. We need to stop being the worlds police! We need to learn to say no when poor countries come to us for help regarding military issues, because we always become the bad guy in the end.

2006-08-15 11:54:42 · answer #4 · answered by alphawhiskey43 3 · 0 0

I agree with you. It is indeed a very complex and gigantic task . It is possible only if world leaders cooperate and pool resources to eliminate the scourge of terrorism.It has to be fought on several fronts both short term and long term. On the short term you make your country safe by strong intelligence,defense/ paramilitary forces and an active participation by general public besides guarding your international borders for illegal immigrants/ terrorists gaining entry. On the long term the key idea is to make it attractive for the terrorists to reject the path of violence and take to peaceful ways.Target ting of communities and racial hatred has to stop and punishment made deterrent. All serious international disputes(flash points) have to be resolved (at least to a cease-fire level)as far as possible to the satisfaction of those concerned. A program of education to eradicate illiteracy and blind beliefs devoid of logic and reason has to start. A plan to help poor countries to accelerate development for better life for its people has to be implemented. All this is easier said than done. It needs great deal of resources. More importantly it needs leaders having great vision which is a commodity in short supply in the current political scenario.

2006-08-15 10:46:30 · answer #5 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 0 0

Well, the last nimrod that held the office of president of the US. tried your approach. His idea for foreign affairs was a win, win situation for everyone. He enjoyed the time he spent with Boris Yeltsin. It was interesting to see the two of them together, walking arm in arm like a couple of old buddies. He wanted the same thing with the Chinese. Why, he was so anxious to make friends with them, that he invited their scientist to visit our own super secret facilities at Los Alamos. Yes sir, he wanted to make friends with the world, so much so, that he cut a deal with N.Korea for a nuclear reactor, as a power source only, of course.

The one thing the damn fool didn't take into account is he was dealing with dishonest people. How would he know that, when he still believes in Santa Claus.

So, I think the hate filled world is here to stay. The one advantage to that is, things can only get better! I think????

2006-08-15 11:14:04 · answer #6 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0 0

You'd think that would be the answer. I mean terrorists are attcking us for 50 years of failed foreign policy. You'd think they'd learn. but, sadly, no.

If you look at where extremism lies, in places like Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, the root cause is unemployment and illteracy. Afghanistan is now the opium producing capital of the world. And that's AFTER we invaded and "helped" it.Why? Under the Taliban, there was the fear of death. But, as much as I hate to say this, they also tried to help their countrymen out. It wasn't very successful, but it's more of an effort than what we've been doing.

We need to rethink our foreign policy. More emphasis on eductaion and employment. We need to encourage countries to practice fair hiring and job laws. They need to look at qualifications not at family ties. Atta, the leader of the 9/11 hijackers was highly educated, he was more qualified than anyone else for the position he applied for in the public works field. But he kept losing out because of nepotism. Everyone that got hired was, in some way, related to the guys hiring.

2006-08-15 10:35:17 · answer #7 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 0 0

OK when 9/11 happened the Presidents name was Bush. If you were president during 9/11 then the name would be yours. Forget the name. I believe in political assassination, and if we would assassinate all the terrorist leaders and politicians who support them, things would be a little better. Get rid of the U.N. and start a "World Council of Democratic Countries".

2006-08-15 11:12:37 · answer #8 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 0 0

"Terror" is a tactic... not an organization. So it is a "Police" problem, not a military one. The whole "War on Terror" is un-winnable in the first place. The American people have been duped. If we don't wake up soon, we will be bombed into annihilation. (as a species.. not as a country.)

2006-08-15 10:35:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well exactly what would you do? The stated goal of the muslims we are fighting is nothing less than the takeover of the world by islam. There is no room for negotiation there. USA will never bow to freaking mecca

2006-08-15 10:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers