the civilian deaths are because of hesbola.
they are cowards and loosers.
they hide in the civilian homes.
fire their rockets. then run like cowards.
then the civilians get killed. when Israel tries to defend itself.
2006-08-15 02:49:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes one thing they gained is the backing of bush and blair which they knew they had anyway, but now its infront of everyone to see that there are 3 super powers who dont care about humanity,or how many people they kill, innocent civillians or not, they dont care about distroying a countries infrastucture.
what they fail to understand is that this kind of behaviour not only kills people now but, it has a lasting effect on these countries future's, these are all 3rd world countries, and those who have visited the 3rd world know that poor are very poor and if we were to back this type of behaviour then all we are doing is making them even poorer.
these bombs are not targetted at any millitary targets but instead they are hitting civillians, and in return the israelies are loosing this war, the people of israel them selves are a bit relentless with their government, as they can see that they are loosing the fight, battle and the war.
2006-08-15 03:02:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel responded defensively to an overt act of war by Hizbollah.
Lebanon has been reluctant to reign in this terrorist group while trying to rebuild their country after Syrian occupation.
Hizbollah has repeatedly called for an end to Israel and death to its citizens, and demonstrated their contempt for the Holy Land time and time again.
Israel stood up to its attacker; protected its border; and squelched the nation that has been playing host for Hizbollah.
Hizbollah holds such hatred for Israel that they will target their own Palestinian-Moslem brothers and sister who live in Israel.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand."
When even France identifies Lebanese-Hizbollah as the agressor, maybe we should listen.
2006-08-15 03:00:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bob L 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. There is now a U.N. resolution to demand: (a) the return of the kidnapped soldiers, (b) the disarming of Hezbolla, and (c) a good reason to come back and do it all over again when Hezbolla violates the resolution.
2006-08-15 02:50:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by crispy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, they should have stayed until hezbollah was killed and then took over lebanon, so maybe they would stop being attacked, but that would bring iran and syria in the picture sooner, man i feel bad for israel, people hate them just because of their religon.
2006-08-15 02:49:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
why do i feel that this is israel at fault here didnt the hez started it out? didnt the hez uses the "innocent" civilians as a shield in order to fire their rockets in israel? didnt anyone think in this way that israel is merely responding
2006-08-15 02:54:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dave B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
An answer by a must-see news clip:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html
2006-08-16 02:51:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by toon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means that Hezbull will have a harder time getting rockest that will reach Israel!
Thats good!
2006-08-15 06:14:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Grandreal 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel sent a message to the Arab world: "Don't mess with us or we'll mess you up, (I have half the superpowers on my side)"
2006-08-15 02:51:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by nysmnyd 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither side is innocent. But war is never pretty.
2006-08-15 02:46:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋