tidal waves
2006-08-14 23:50:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by supraman126 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i know the answer as in the world planets are goign i n a just a way so that the plantes doesn t crsh i m not good in english so when there s no moon there will no be any staelits so the earth will take another way and it can smash in another planet
je veut dire que dans l univers les plantes ont une route sepecifique mais quand il y a pas de lune il n aura pas de satelites et les planetes vont se cracher en eux comme des voiture
2006-08-15 07:47:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The money that took Neil Armstrong to the moon would have been invested in some other productive channel...
2006-08-15 06:51:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by taurus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Several things:
1) there would be no periodic tides...
2) you'd no longer be able to MOON someone.
3) about 2,000 songs would make NO SENSE at all.
2006-08-15 06:48:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Cheese rationing.
2006-08-15 06:50:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by ITS ME 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
wasnt the first to answer but i did get two points! yay
2006-08-15 06:50:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mrs D 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be REALLY REALLY dark at night.....there would be no tidal waves, the sea would be calm....
And yes, that's right...no more moon cheese. =( *is sad*
2006-08-15 07:01:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by abcdefg 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe there would be no tides, thus the sealife would perish, setting off a chain reaction of bad stuff. <*)))><
2006-08-15 06:49:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sandylynn 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The sun would always shine. It would be day time all the time. Wait im guessing this. but im sure its right.
2006-08-15 06:48:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by SquiBBLe 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
there would be no tides and women would suffer. lol go pete from big brother for saying this lol
2006-08-15 06:48:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by xxmexx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋