Having armed security guards, having bomb-proof cabin doors, having effective passenger security check-ins - all of these ideas have been vetted BEFORE 9/11 and after (of course)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2001/10/01/elal-usat.htm
El Al , the Israeli airline has used all of these methods for years
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Al When the proposal was made in this country to require air carriers to meet more stringent security requirements, it was blocked by the administration:
"US airlines are adamantly opposed to the proposal to increase the security tax on airline tickets from its current $2.50 one-way to $5.50, with a new cap of $8.00 for a multi-leg one-way trip (up from $5.00). Their concern is that today’s fierce competition makes it impossible for them to pass along the added cost to the passenger, making the additional $3 per flight yet another tax on hard-pressed airlines. As a public policy point, they argue that aviation security is really part of national defense, and hence should be paid for by all taxpayers."
http://www.rppi.org/aviationsecurity13.html
So the reason there are no armed guards is that airlines seek to keep costs at a minimum, and the present administration supports them .
2006-08-14 21:20:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Knowitall 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I hear Dick "quick trigger" Cheney will be flying to provide security services. He enjoys being armed and dangerous!
EDIT:
Ok, seriously, if they are identifiable, the terrorists will devise a means to deal with them first. Undercover is better, so then they will be in a position to take effective action, on their terms.
It's not like a uniformed cop versus undercover cop on the street. A uniformed cop will deter fringe criminals from committing any bad acts, but a terrorist is on a plane for one purpose only. Showing a uniform won't be beneficial in keeping little Johnny in line, since most people who fly are not borderline criminals.
2006-08-15 04:00:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by powhound 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
That's a whole lot of people to pay good money to. We're talking probably 10000 people minimum at $40K a year. That's $400 Million a year.
2006-08-15 03:57:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wocka wocka 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
we don't do this due to this being a free country, and most people are to stupid and if you fired a gun in an airplane it would cause a very bad chain of events it would be like opening the door at 30,000ft then the plane would crash and kill most on bord
2006-08-15 04:05:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by jr 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't want to feel like I'm in a military barracks for 5 hours when I'm flying to Miami with my wife and kids for vacation.
2006-08-15 03:56:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ic1212 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because we don't have enough money in the Homeland Security budget - as if we actually have Homeland Security.
2006-08-15 04:00:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why don't you become one and apply for the job for some airline, spread the wealth and maybe that will happen. Good question though!
2006-08-15 03:58:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cherries 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Isn't it better if the bad guys don't know who is armed?
2006-08-15 03:57:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I've never seen that, if it's true then it must be a new thing.
2006-08-15 03:59:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
its safer to have undercover cops
2006-08-15 04:06:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by jason 4
·
0⤊
0⤋