How can an ordinary person get a bad law repealed?

Question

For instance, does it need to be put into a petition, then get a certain number of signatures? BTW, it's Okahoma I'm talking about, in case it's different in different states.

Also, if it's a bad law, making something or things now illegal that used to be legal, could you get arrested or at least hasstled if you write to your congress person(s)?

Answer 1

It is not easy!

a petition is one way, but that requires informing enough ppl about the prob, and getting enough support to make politicians think they may lose thier cushy job if they dont at least appear to be listening to "the ppl"

In order to get the message out there u need publicity...thats where demonstration comes in...but that can be a risky bizz in these "terrorist" days.

Dont like to be a wet blanket but the chances are not good. If the media decides to portray you and your cause as "crackpot" chances of success drop sharply.

Answer 2

Write Your Senators And Tell Them To Legalize Marijuana & Collect Signatures From All Of Your Stoned Friends. That's What I'd Do At Least.

Answer 3

You don't need a laywer. And you have every right to write or call your congressperson(s). You can't get arrested for speaking your mind about the issues, per the first amendment. Getting a petition together is a start. Do research about the law you are trying to change - you just might find others who are fighting it as well. Start a political action committee and get others to write to your elected officials. Contact like-minded politicians or others involved in the political process and find out from them the steps you need to take.

Answer 4

Petition the court that a law is violative of the constitution, against morals or public order. The court has jurisdiction over repeal of laws.

Answer 5

Get genuine. The Republicans in Congress are no longer virtually as upset approximately this as their whining ought to look to point. The regulation is going to make their friends interior the wellbeing care industry a ton of money. you will hear distinctive proceedings, yet little or no action. Their significant motivation for struggling with the legislations had no longer something to do with wellbeing care, and each little thing to do with them blindly opposing each little thing President Obama and the Democrats have been putting forward in an attempt to interrupt his authority and capability. In government, that's called "politics" and everywhere else it incredibly is called being a "infantile spoilsport". The coverage companies have been struggling with it by way of fact it in basic terms provides them approximately 80% of what they needed. Their purpose grow to be to highjack the excellent reform technique for his or her own ends. The coverage companies are already putting their income projections at the same time for the subsequent 2 many years. They comprehend this entire component is going to pour money into their wallet so speedy that they are going to ought to purchase greater desirable funnels, on a similar time as they stitch greater desirable wallet into their pants. Any Republican congress-creature that fights it, at this component can kiss his marketing campaign contributions bye-bye. Getting lower back to your question, you're heavily comparing the attempt to grant wellbeing care to a greater type of people to slavery and prohibition? enable's see, on the single hand I relatively have "compassion" and on the different I relatively have "slavery". Are they the comparable? No, i do no longer think of so. you need to be ashamed for even asking your question in those words. i think of your "will to repeal" is plenty decrease than you think of. it is going to grow to be even smaller whilst human beings finally start up understanding all the best issues this regulation will do for them. there's a danger that the "mandatory coverage" and penalty section ought to work out a valuable legal undertaking, yet that's approximately it, or maybe then, it is going to in basic terms replace the financing shape, incredibly. The outcomes for no longer being coated are relatively enormously laughably small.

Answer 6

Lobby the lawmakers!

Answer 7

Get a lawyer.