English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

bush and blair waged war like hitler and mussolini.both goup has no aim for betterment.the iraq war and afghanistan war were not like of hitler and mussolini war of poland chech and spain.

2006-08-14 19:28:42 · 22 answers · asked by nawab allam 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

22 answers

To be a pair of fascist like a pair of Hitler and Mussolini would indicate they are dictators. The fact is, they are the two strongest leaders who support democracy. Together, they have not allowed a single democracy to fall; although Bush has stepped on some of the American's civil liberties.

2006-08-22 13:00:45 · answer #1 · answered by VietVet 3 · 0 0

Right, but they own you and me, !

And they worked hard to be that high, so they won't let us talk free for long, they have great plans for us..

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

The Bush's helped finance the Waffen SS and SA.
The Bush family has had dealings with Saddam Hussein involving oil drilling and real estate.
The Bush family has connections to the Bin Laden family. This includes a close partnership in the Carlyle group and Arbusto oil. The Bin Ladens and the Bush's have had a long close relationship.
However I don't know if they actually had money taken away being the Bush family has been known to bribe politicians.
t's funny how the Bush family has business dealings with people and governments who kill Americans. The people who are the biggest threat to our national security are friends and partners with the Bush's.
Makes you wonder who's side the Bush's are on.http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...

2006-08-14 19:37:57 · answer #2 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0 1

Brilliant, how revolutionary. Comparing Bush and Blair too Hitler and Mussolini. Never heard that one before. How freaking original.

Honestly moron, lets be real here. Hitler as a racist who was elected for life, not exactly democratic. He ethnically cleansed most of western Europe. Hitler was also on a crusade for a German manifest destiny. It was his goal to unite Europe and maybe the world under the German flag. Bush has gone to war but given the nations back to its people.

Your statement is ridiculous. Before you make such comparisons you might want to learn history.

2006-08-14 19:37:32 · answer #3 · answered by Jon H 5 · 1 0

Hitler and Mussolini didn't fight against terrorists, they were terrorists. Why can't the people of Iraq and Afghanistan fight their own battles? Why are Muslims willing to kill innocent people but, they can't stand up for justice? Does anyone really think any American would want to be in any of those countries? Even there own people don't want to live there. They keep coming over here.

2006-08-20 10:55:57 · answer #4 · answered by jackie 6 · 0 0

You can call them whatever you want! The only difference is that if you critisized Hilter and Mussolini, you'd be shot. That's a big difference...

With that aside.. I'm an American and don't agree with what our president has done. His bias against muslim countries is pitiful. He's done more to hurt our image in the world than any president in the history of our country. We pursued these wars in response to 911, but 911 was due to a bunch of criminals not by any state. It's like fighting the mafia with tanks and missiles.

2006-08-14 19:37:47 · answer #5 · answered by Chuck 1 · 2 0

You can call them Facist, just some people will disagree with you. And, no they have no waged war like Hitler and Mussolini. And neither Hilter nor Mussolini waged war on Spain. Spain was in a civil war at the time.

2006-08-14 19:34:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

After 9/11 foolish rulers refused to hand over conspirator to USA. There was no alternative left but to normalize Afghanistan. USA has its own agenda in Middle East. Present position is that armed presence is in the interest of Iraqi people. It will be disastrous if foreign troops are withdrawn until complete peace. Both the leaders understand the situation. They have their own way to fight terrorism and fulfil their own agenda.. The comparison made by you has no basis. You have been too harsh.

2006-08-22 07:43:21 · answer #7 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0 0

I like Blair but Bush is stupid. He has disgraced America as a President. Bush went all out war. Blair is just trying to keep good relations with America.

2006-08-22 04:19:40 · answer #8 · answered by Here's your answer or questi 2 · 0 0

Because, so far, Bush and Blair have shown some respect for democracy. But at the rate that freedoms are being eroded this may not last long.

2006-08-14 19:35:14 · answer #9 · answered by iansand 7 · 2 0

President Bush and Mr. Blair are not actively preaching hatred, and have not rounded up millions of people to be gassed or shot.Please study your history before you make rash generalizations.

2006-08-22 15:41:40 · answer #10 · answered by hollyltstarfleet 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers