Who Do 'You' Trust To Best Fight Terror and Keep Americans Safe?

Question

The arrests of the terrorists in England has once again brought home the real danger we all face from fanatical Muslim killers.

The N.Y. Times and Liberals oppose most information gathering techniques used by the Bush administration. Things like phone surveillance by the NSA of suspected overseas calls, and coerced interrogation of captured terror suspects.

The far left wing liberal New York Times editorialized today: "We want to understand as much as possible about what the terrorists were planning. It would be so much better if we could do that by giving every benefit of the doubt to these muslims and protect their Rights ."

Then I read the right wing editorial page at The Wall Street Journal which said this, "The London terror plot was foiled because a large number of people were under surveillance concerning their spending, travel and communications. Which leads us to wonder if Scotland Yard would have succeeded if the ACLU or The New York Times got wind of this operation

Answer 1

Chuck Norris.

Answer 2

Anyone who would punish those responsible for terror against Yugoslavia (including Republika Srpska, RSK, Abdic's autonomy, etc.) and Iraq, can then go ahead and fight against other forms of terror. Then I think he should be trusted to do the best job.

Answer 3

the United Kingdom

Answer 4

You are of course totally correct but this question is wasted on liberals. The democrats should add one more animal to their mascot. Let the dumb asss donkey be joined by an ostrich with it's head in the ground. A fitting tribute to democrats who can't see what's right in front of them.

Answer 5

I trust the republicans more than the democrats because the democrats kept slashing the buget of the CIA, FBI, and the military intelegence as well as the military in the 90's.

Answer 6

Our president for one as there have been zero attacks against americans on our soil since 9/11

Answer 7

properly in the event that they do it relatively is a conflict crime as below the Geneva convention in the event that they decide to attack a place have been there are civilians they might desire to the two evacuate them first or grant a secure hall for escapeing civilians.They have not complied with the convention so some distance,I doubt they ever will.