English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was it just me or was Wallace somewhat disrespectfull to Ahmadinejad? Disrespectful to the president of a nation, regardless of their political leanings.

2006-08-14 17:01:36 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

6 answers

No, he did good showing profound differences that is often depicted as good vs evil. He asked things lot of people would want to ask. The interview shows we need some direct talk with Iran. How are we going to come up with diplomatic solutions if we label them evil and refuse to talk to them?

2006-08-14 19:26:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Mike Wallace was pathetic. He practically gushed all over the President. It amazes me to see the complaints from some of you that he was disrespectful. Have any of you read or heard the claims from Ahmadinejad. He wants to wipe Isreal off the map. That's his claim. The guys a terrorist and should be treated as such. He's not a President he's a dictator. First Dan Rather interviews Suddam and throws up softball questions. Now we get Wallace saying he doesn't believe this guy's an anti-semite. Wake up and realize your getting your news from the most far left leaning individuals of the world.

2006-08-16 16:18:31 · answer #2 · answered by Wake up America 1 · 0 2

Mike Wallace was HORRIBLE. He was rude, agressive, and flippant. The Iranian president, on the other hand, seemed articulate, in control, and relaxed. He smiled a lot.

A "veteran" news man like Wallace should have learned some patience by this point in his career. Now the Iranians will show this tape in Iran and everyone will think we're ALL rude, hot tempered, impatient agressors. It's unfortunate that he represented us that way.

2006-08-15 13:39:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'm surprised Ahmadinejad agreed to the interview when he was unwilling to answer Mike Wallace's questions. Guess he just wanted a chance to get his message out no matter what.
Clearly, Mike Wallace didn't respect the man. It was an awkward, uncomfortable interview.

2006-08-15 01:52:27 · answer #4 · answered by lottyjoy 6 · 3 2

I watched the interview.

I now pronounce them man and wife.

It was like they should have gone to get a hotel room or something. They were all over each other.

Sorry, I thought Mike was kind of weak and there is your proof that he is NOT the "hard hitting" reporter he has always been portrayed as..

The interview was a joke.

2006-08-15 00:05:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

yeah kinda

2006-08-15 01:00:59 · answer #6 · answered by simpleplan0013 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers