English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you had to give up one of these things- Family, Freedom, or Romantic Love (a.k.a man-woman relationships). Which would be your priority and which could you do without?

2006-08-14 16:21:53 · 30 answers · asked by LM 1 in Social Science Other - Social Science

30 answers

none

2006-08-14 16:25:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would give up romantic love. As long as I have my family and my freedom, that's all I need. If I at least got to experience the romantic love before I lost it, I could live with that, but my family and freedom are of the utmost importance.

2006-08-14 16:28:26 · answer #2 · answered by ~SSIRREN~ 6 · 0 0

I can never give up freedom. then next would be my family. because of these two things I am allowed to love whom I wish to in the way that i want to openly. I dont think its the greatest that you defined romantic love as only being between a man and a woman though.

2006-08-14 16:26:07 · answer #3 · answered by demorie2003 1 · 0 0

It would have to be romantic love. I would still enjoy love from my family. Not the same but still a form of love. Freedom.......I could give up only if I was guaranteed the other two. Family I could never give up. Period.

2006-08-14 16:31:34 · answer #4 · answered by Sandrastasia 2 · 0 0

If you never had it, can't give it up, right? Some people never had freedom, some: a decent relationship, and some have been orphans all their lives. For those who've had all three, I think giving up family is easier to do, if family never functioned as so. (thus: the dysfunctional family). Relationships: can't live with 'em, can't live w/o 'em. Remember that saying? Freedom? Who doesn't sacrifice some of their freedom for the price of security? That's a hard one to answer.

2006-08-21 17:29:56 · answer #5 · answered by fingerssfv 3 · 0 0

The one I would give up first would be Freedom. I figure captivity is more doable with the love of a family and a spouse. Freedom would be useless without them.

2006-08-14 16:28:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would give up Romantic Love. it's the only thing that depends on you, and the other person.

Family depends on you and many others,
Freedom does not depend you, it depends on the society you live in.

2006-08-14 16:27:38 · answer #7 · answered by Rali K 2 · 0 0

romantic love.
lack of freedom can have serious physical consequences, a family you're usually brought up in so the bonds are older, emotional.
romantic love is one of the lighter things in life, cherry on the cake

2006-08-20 04:07:43 · answer #8 · answered by benga 1 · 0 0

Absolutely, without any doubt, romantic love. And freedom is a must. Freedom is like your health, nothing else matters if you don't have it.

2006-08-20 00:08:59 · answer #9 · answered by deedleydee 3 · 0 0

My priority would be my family. I could give up romantic love.

2006-08-14 17:35:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Id give up romantic love first,freedom second,and fight to the death to keep my family.

2006-08-21 15:50:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers