I MEAN SUPPOSEDLY THIS IS WHAT THE 'LIBS' DO. YET I HEAR NOTHING SAID ABOUT BUSH DOING THE SAME THING!!
2006-08-14 16:00:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The largest expansion of government ever, record deficits, 10 billion for a war that should have never happened. Yes, he is an American beaut. You have to realize that repuglicans are the more mentally diminished of the population and can not think for themselves. If Rush don't say it or they don't hear it on Faux news then it isn't so.
2006-08-14 16:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
John Stossel did a report for ABC's 20/20 called John Stossel goes to Washington. You know what he found out? REPUBLICANS HAVE MADE OUR GOVERNMENT BIGGER.
Republicans talk about smaller government, but those are Lie's according to Stossel. More money is spent under the Republicants and they increase the size of government way more then Democrates.
2006-08-14 16:13:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't do that.. is the legislature who is responsible for the purse strings. Get more involved in political responsibilities. So you can make the knowledgable statements. Rather than taking a stab in the dark. You can also place some of the blame on the 9/11 commission.. They made the recommendations and the demands.
2006-08-14 16:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You obviously aren't looking very hard. Try tuning in to ANY of the "evil A.M. talk radio shows" like Rush, Sean, Glenn, Savage, et. al. Conservatives have been criticizing Bush for his out of control spending since the whole prescription drug fiasco. Why do you think his approval rating has gotten so low. 49% of the country (liberals) hated him from day 1, the only way he can lose points is for conservatives to turn on him.
Turn off the caps.
2006-08-14 16:50:18 · answer #4 · answered by ouskip1998 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush is increasing the spending but not the government. That is a job done well enough by the dummycrats. They work on the premise that once you give someone a job they do not deserve they are yours for life. It is like getting them hooked on crack only in this case it is giving them jobs they are not qualified for. Don't misunderstand me both parties do it but the dummycrats usually create more jobs to fill.
2006-08-14 16:07:08 · answer #5 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually I do he isn't a conservative, but he's a lot more conservative than kerry or gore. Its like compaying driving in the middle lane versus driving off the road....
He said he'd defund the EPA and BATF.... that hasn't happened and I'm not lookin for it either.
2006-08-14 16:07:34 · answer #6 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Many Republicans have criticised him for this. I guess more people don't because we figure it would really be bad with a lib in the office.
It's funny you should criticise the president on this though, because a lot of the spending was done as a compromise with the libs.
2006-08-14 16:07:07 · answer #7 · answered by plebes02 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, there are so many issues to pick on Bush for, that an important one like this gets skipped over because its boring.
2006-08-14 16:06:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Isn't that a fundamental definition of a neoconservative? That they are less opposed to big government and lavish spending than most republicans?
2006-08-14 16:06:38 · answer #9 · answered by S.G. 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
OHH AND ALL THOSE SOCIAL PROGRAMS THE DEMS KEEP CREATING TO PROMOTE THE WELFARE STATE....I'D MUCH RATHER SPEND MONEY ON DEFENSE...SOMETHING THE DEMS WILL NEVER DO....THEN CREATE A WELFARE 'PLANET"
2006-08-14 16:12:03 · answer #10 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋