Israel does not want a lasting peace. It wishes to gain as much ground in the Middle East as possible. That is why it has not implemented Resolution 242, even though it has been on the table for 30 years. The US is a staunch supporter of Israel's imperialist tendacies, so it is covered against UN action. However, it is learning that even with its superior military, the Arabs will not just roll over and play dead. They were forced to withdraw from Southern Lebanon because of the resistance they faced. Right now, they are torn between various policies. The West Bank is extremely profitable, so they will not let go of it. However, Hezbollah has expressed solidarity with the Palestinian cause and will not stop fighting the occupying forces. In the end, Israel will rely increasingly on aerial slaughters of civilians to maintain the current level of peace and security, but will never comply with international regulations which can ensure a lasting peace.
2006-08-14 15:54:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You see, that is the point. The state of Israel does not have any religious meaning. The land was "given" to the Zionists who call it Israel unjustifiably. If these were true, Torah believing Jews in Israel, the whole issue of peace would not be an issue. Jews, Muslims and Christians were living together in peace prior to the invasion that created Israel. They were living together as brothers from the early seventh century until 1948 when the UN and Britain decided to give the land who belonged to others away. The illegal state of "Israel" in Palestine was a HUGE mistake. The fact that they use the name Israel is a disgrace since they represent nothing that is good and holy. Palestinians will one day succeed in returning to their land and homes. Once the people of the world agree that the Zionist state of "Israel" is actually a part of the "new world order" and the only religion they believe in is Zionism.
2006-08-16 08:56:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by one voice 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is in answer to the above question and also to some of the rather badly misinformed contributors we've had so far: The facts are that the geo-political makeup of the entire near-east is a very recent historical phenomenon dreamed up by a bunch of europeans trying to solve their "Jewish Problem". Don't get the idea that anti-semitism was only to be found in Germany in the early 20th century.
The history in a nutshell: The europeans handed Palestine to the Jewish people around 80 years ago, even though the indiginous people actually living there were 85% non-jewish (and had been for at least 500 years), and without any credible right to be so high-handed about other peoples countries (sounds familiar huh? - all power corrupts etc.). The political fallout of that arrogance is the root cause of the troubles in the mid-east.
The solution for the mideast?
1. Acknowledgement of the above facts from Israel.
2. Acceptance of the status quo by the Palestinians.
3. Provision os a large amount of cash from Europe and the US to create a viable palestinian state.
If you have time, please read some of the material below.
2006-08-14 16:09:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by zed hex 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
The land of Israel should be split in half. The northern half would be Palestine and the southern half Israel.
In the middle occupying Jerusalem would be the U.N. with a corridor that divides these lands from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea. Stationed there should be 200,000 man Rapid Reaction Force capable of delivering a serious smack down to ANYONE in the region that acts out of line.
This solution creates peace in the region and gets the U.N. out of New York .
2006-08-19 14:58:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is the biggest load of crap I ever read. Israel just gave a bunch of land back to the Palestinians and was scheduled to give more back this summer. It's those who "claim" to be pro Palestinian who are messing it up for everyone. If Hesbulah and Hamas would stop kidnapping Israeli soldiers and shooting rockets at Israel, it would go a long way towards the peace process.
2006-08-19 13:13:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shishi 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Israel was given a small territory after Hitler tried to annihilate them. After what they went through most nations felt they deserved it. Some hoped they would all migrate to their new home and they would be out of their countries. Whatever their reasoning, the land was given to them. Immediately the Arab nations tried to drive them into the sea. It didn't work. They tried several times. They did not work either. Israel took vast areas of land when they had to defend themselves. They should have kept it all. It is the only way they can protect the little area they were given. The Bible tells us in Genesis 16:12 that Ishmael (the father of the Arab peoples) is a wild man whose hand will be against everyone, and everyone against him, and he will live in hostility even against his own brothers. How true that is today.
Israel must defend itself against this hostility. It is their legal, moral and political right.They would love to live in peace with their neighbors.
2006-08-14 16:09:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by deac 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We must Trial Zionists, and Illuminati
They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...
1. Monetary and sex bribery was to be used to obtain control of men already in high places in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavor. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati, they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and physical harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.
2. The Illuminati who were on the faculty of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability and who belonged to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in Internationalism. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships, like the Rhodes Scholarship, to those selected by the Illuminati. All such scholars were to be first persuaded and then convinced that men of special talent and brains had the right to rule those less gifted on the grounds that the masses do not know what is best for them physically, mentally, and spiritually.
2006-08-20 19:20:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
True, israel will not risk peace.
Israel is a relatively new,but temporary, country for the jews.
thier time there is limited , especially since they lost against hezbollah in this skirmish
if we(that live here in america) had the choice of sending our money to israel that place would fall overnight
2006-08-14 16:27:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by mumin azraaq 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Israel did give back like 90% of the land that the UN called for. It stopped the attacks just long enough for Hamas to regroup and continue to attack them. Hamas and Hezbollah are not fighting for the creation of Palestine. That's already there. And only thanks to Israel, b/c it wasn't there before they moved in there and then withdrew. The disputed land belonged to 3 different Arab nations. None of which was wanting to make a Palestinian home land out of any of it when they controlled it. Hamas and Hezbollah's goal is the destruction of Israel. They'll never stop until they are dead or achieve their goal.
2006-08-14 16:04:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by rummy714 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
How can peace be achieved by either side with the intolerance and hate that both are extorting? The answer is tolerance and reason... With out it you are doomed to a struggle you can never win because you will have lost sight of the true goal.... freedom... Free your self of hate.. be tolerant to others views and ideals even if you don't share them. Co exist in knowledge and reason. Its a lot better than killing each other and living in hate.
2006-08-14 16:00:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by hedddon 5
·
1⤊
0⤋