2006-08-14 15:28:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sure go for it. That will save more of it for those of us that actually have some where to go and something to do with our lives.
2006-08-14 15:36:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then the libs would complain about the excess methane gases being emitted. Not to mention the clutter of hay all over the place.
You do know that they, at one time wanted a multi-million dollar research into this same methane gas emission from all the cows in the country. Completely overlooking the numerous animals in Africa. This only applied to the states. And they wonder why they aren't in the majority??????
2006-08-14 22:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I honestly dont think so, because when you add up medical care plus the price of the animal, housing, and food it costs more in the long run and people dont wanna spend money
2006-08-14 22:38:06 · answer #3 · answered by SP 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you man the shovels. Talk about pollution and greenhouse gases.
2006-08-14 22:54:11 · answer #4 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes but I will need to ride about 360 at once, for this is my everday ride, AND I CANT STOP LAUGHING EVERYTIME I READ DAVID C'S LINE!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-08-14 22:35:10 · answer #5 · answered by supervfive 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go right ahead, but don't ***** when I blow by you in my SUV
2006-08-14 22:32:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, we would be upto our knees in horse **** lol
2006-08-14 22:34:28 · answer #7 · answered by bobnum2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wouldn't that be wonderful? unrealistic but truly wonderful....
2006-08-14 22:39:08 · answer #8 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋