I agree, the marketing genius's may have been on crack when they came up with those uniforms and logo.
2006-08-14 15:19:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by mets9999 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't really get a good look at the logo you're talking about, but I think the uniforms look much better. It won't matter much though, the Vikings still suck.
2006-08-14 22:17:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
teams that need to change Logo Vikings, rams, and lions they could be so much cooler with their mascots but yeah vikings look horrid MV more like VD
2006-08-14 22:18:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by bao187 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Also wasn't impressed at all with the Vikes new uniforms....purple is ugly to begin with but they should have stayed with the old uniforms...
2006-08-14 23:47:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Uni's are new, and the logo has been around for a season, it's just that SNF or MNF haven't visited the Dome in awhile.
2006-08-14 22:17:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by sportsguy2315 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its called an image change after the loveboat incident last year, oh and probably to try to attract a more mature crowd.
doesnt matter, my Bears will crush the Vike's this year.
2006-08-14 22:19:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by jman83 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that the logo is new. They need some type of encouragement.
2006-08-14 23:11:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by renee1078 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah they suck thats for sure. and to the guy about the lions unis I think the black ones are cool but I agree the rams bears and minnesota are lame
2006-08-14 22:22:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by casey l 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, they look awful..just like the new ref look..who designs this crap?
2006-08-14 22:21:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nah i like the new uniforms..
2006-08-14 22:39:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Papa[s]murF 2
·
0⤊
0⤋