English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Without demeaning Bradshaw in any way (he deserves to be in the HOF), I'd take Elway. They both had rocket launchers for arms, and hung tough in the pocket, but #7 had more ways to beat you (and also had to manufacture much more on his own than Bradshaw).

2006-08-14 18:58:47 · answer #1 · answered by Da Whispering Genius 4 · 0 0

John Elway was the better all round quarterback but other than Montana there never was a better Super Bowl quarterback than Terry Bradshaw.

2006-08-14 21:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0 0

Terry Bradshaw

2006-08-14 21:46:19 · answer #3 · answered by litespeed2rw 6 · 0 0

Is this a trick question? Elway hands down and by a wide margin. Bradshaw was part of some super Steeler teams but was a better than average QB at best

2006-08-14 23:52:50 · answer #4 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0 0

John Elway

2006-08-14 21:42:42 · answer #5 · answered by Danielle M 3 · 0 0

John Elway!

2006-08-15 16:26:42 · answer #6 · answered by bsktbllchica 2 · 0 0

I have to go with Bradshaw because he had more championships. He knew how to win.
Elway was more physically gifted, but I would take Bradshaw.
That is a fantastic question. You always hear Elway vs. Marino, or Favre, or somebody else. First time I have heard that.

2006-08-14 22:47:26 · answer #7 · answered by TG Special 5 · 0 0

Bradshaw 4-0
Elway 2-4
Let's take the Louisiana Rifle.

2006-08-15 09:42:24 · answer #8 · answered by smitty 7 · 0 0

Based on performance when the black chips were on the table, Bradshaw. But, he had a better supporting cast.

2006-08-14 21:44:03 · answer #9 · answered by homerunhitter 4 · 0 0

Bradshaw! both had alot of talent!

2006-08-16 03:01:51 · answer #10 · answered by Pittslady#1 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers