yes, the x>3 makes a difference, but only in regards to the domain of f(x).
But no, your calculation of the inverse is not correct. Remember, to solve for the inverse, you swap x and y (or f(x) in this case) and solve for y. Here you've got a natural log. That should give you a hint that you should be using an exponential somewhere.
The function that you solved for is the inverse function of:
(sqrt(9x^2+1)+1)/x or -(sqrt(9x^2+1)-1)/x
Remember, to check if something is the inverse, substitute it back in. you should get x back.
2006-08-14 14:46:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by a_liberal_economist 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, the x>3 is important. It is important because the function ln(y) doesn't work if y is less than or equal to zero. Try it in your calculator; you'll get an error
In this case, if x is equal to three, you'll get ln(0), which doesn't work. Less than 3, and you'll get ln() of some negative number, which also doesn't work.
It doesn't really make a difference in your answer, though, except for the answer you only want the positive square root (not the negative square root)
And the answer should be: f^-1(x)=sqrt(e^x + 9)
(where sqrt(y) is the positive square root of y, and "e" is the number e)
You get it like this:
f(x)=ln(x^2-9)
e^f(x) = e^( ln(x^2 - 9) )
e^f(x) = x^2 - 9
e^f(x) + 9 = x^2
sqrt(e^f(x) + 9) = x
Thus, f^-1(x)=sqrt(e^x + 9)
2006-08-14 14:44:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by extton 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The restriction that x>3 keeps ln(x^2-9) in the range of the real numbers.
Now, let y=ln(x^2-9) so e^y=x^2 - 9 and solve for x
x = √((e^y)+9)
This is why x>3 happens (for real-valued x,y) since, no matter how large y gets (in the negative direction) e^y only approaches 0 so ((e^y)+9) approaches 9 and
√((e^y)+9) approaches 3.
Doug
2006-08-14 15:06:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Set the function equivalent to a special variable, say "y": f(x) = y y = (x^2 - 4) / (2x^2) Now sparkling up this for x in words of y. you receives a sparkling function in words of y. This function might want to be the inverse of f(x). the way in which to target that's to likely merely multiply each and each area by technique of 2x^2 and integrate like words. you may want to finally get: (2y - a million)*x^2 = 4 x^2 = 4 / (2y-a million) x = sqrt(4 / (2y-a million)) and so on. So the inverse function of f(x), enable's call it g(y), is: g(y) = (2 * sqrt(2y-a million)) / (2y-a million)
2016-11-25 01:27:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it makes a difference because if x < or = to 3, your original function does not exist. You can't take the Ln of 0 or a negative number.
y = (e^x+9)^.5
That should be your inverse.
How did I get that? replace x with y and solve for your new x.
2006-08-14 15:00:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Krzysztof_98 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
you need to have x^2>9, which means either x>3 or x<-3, that is,
f^-1(x) = +/- sqrt (e^x+9)
2006-08-14 18:44:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by whittle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it makes a difference, becaue otherwise it might not be defined.
the answer is:
y=ln(x^2-9)
e^y=x^2-9
e^y+9=x^2
square root of (e^y+9)=x
so f^{-1}(x)= square root of (e^x+9)
2006-08-14 18:03:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by lobis3 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Crap I used to know how to do that when I took Algebra... now I'm taking Trigonometry. Sorry I can't help!
2006-08-14 14:41:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
☺☻♥♦♣♠•◘○
2006-08-14 14:48:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Navdeep B 3
·
0⤊
1⤋