2006-08-14 14:31:59 · 20 answers · asked by stekcor_2210 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
no.
2006-08-14 14:37:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a tricky question..HMMM, let me see...Your damn right they should send in more troops...We should have done it right in the first place and landed 500,000 troops in Iraq to be begin with....Granted, we were still able to oust Saddam's gov't and remove his currency($$$) from exchange in 3 weeks, however, more are needed to secure and rebuild the country. On the other hand, we are training and "operationalizing" out quite a few Iraqi soldiers every week...If we can get 150,000 of them "ready to fight and protect"...we may not need to...
On a more personal note: if it wasn't for the democrats, we would have sent in more and had this thing wrapped up 2 years ago...Thanks lib's....
2006-08-14 21:44:26 · answer #2 · answered by quarterback 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does anybody know exactly the body count in Iraq? Enough soldiers have been killed... we are fighting suicide bombers. So, how many more do we send, there needs to be a plan and a good agenda before anybody goes to Iraq.
2006-08-14 22:26:47 · answer #3 · answered by floridagirl2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Americans should stay in America... The reason America is under attack is because Americans have interfered with things outside America since WWI.
China is a superpower, they keep themselves to themselves and you don't see them getting hounded by terrorists and having to fight loads of wars.
2006-08-14 21:37:20 · answer #4 · answered by private 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, if we had the manpower,will,determination,without the gotcha politics on both sides of this great Davide.our biggest concern should be here at home defense,and offense to protect our homes.our estimates by big government overseas have been all wrong. Can we afford to be wrong again at HOME?
2006-08-14 21:56:50 · answer #5 · answered by Ivan M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely...but wait..here i could think of several other pointless deadly exercises first...lets just challenge the world to a duel..and get out our guns take 10 paces and shoot each other..it may have more of an purpose than this war
2006-08-14 21:36:40 · answer #6 · answered by MyDreams2Be 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - they should let the troops that are there do their job instead of listening to all the liberals cry.
War is HELL ............No one ever said it was a PICNIC
2006-08-14 21:47:51 · answer #7 · answered by Akkita 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. We've already lost way too many young paople there. They should bomb away, bring our troops home and let those barbarians kill themselves.
2006-08-14 21:35:58 · answer #8 · answered by *Larry P. he's for me* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should not even be in Iraq
2006-08-14 21:34:59 · answer #9 · answered by mid_mo_fencing 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, we should start bringing our troops home.
2006-08-14 21:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by no nickname 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not more troops more missles.
2006-08-14 21:34:44 · answer #11 · answered by disorder1974 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋