English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I want to know anything about this. I just heard it very, very vaguely and I have no idea what it is. Tell me the pro's and con's of this thing and when it could come into effect....

2006-08-14 14:28:16 · 8 answers · asked by down2earthsmiles 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

It is true that America may be applying this laws to their country??

2006-08-14 14:47:51 · update #1

8 answers

it is when the army is in charge ,and you must do everything they say or get shot

2006-08-14 14:34:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Also when martial law is declared you are more likely to have your rights abused. During Katrina, the criminals when wild and the law could not do anything. During this people had to defend themselves from the criminals. The first thing the mayor did was disarm the law abiding citizens. They took the guns from people defending themselves and their homes. Taking the guns was illegal even in a state of martial law. The second amendment was written to protect the people from this. Law enforcement officers take an oath to uphold the constitution which the second is part of.

2006-08-14 14:46:22 · answer #2 · answered by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4 · 0 0

That is when the military takes over the normal police work. This would only happen in some extreme case. Such as Hurricane Katrine, although it was called a "State of Emergency" but it was basically the same thing.

It basically means that things are so messed up that the police/military don't have to worry about your rights when dealing with civilians.

2006-08-14 14:37:32 · answer #3 · answered by Curt 4 · 0 0

Bush cleverly placed that little paragraph into the Patriot Act and Congress ignored it. i'm nevertheless gazing Bush heavily b/c he can declare himself dictator and declare Martial regulation for most causes ... one in all them being economic instability. BUsh has also made a manage the Canadian military to guard the US authorities might want to the human beings get out of control. I doubt that Obama might want to implement this, yet he's managed by technique of the firms so i doesn't, as yet, say that it may be an impossibility, yet I actually were questioning why Bush has no longer declared it yet and postponed the elections. This nevertheless might want to happen if curiously like Obama will win in the course of the vote tallies. If McCain were to finish a miracle and win the election i'd merely about ensure that HE might want to implement the rule of thumb and grab administration, exceptionally if the Al-Qaeda back up their veiled threat to attack the US IF or perhaps as McCain is elected. inspite of the undeniable fact that it truly is asking like McCain no longer has a probability to win and human beings are nevertheless getting to well known more and more about McCain and Palin on a daily basis so his opportunities dwindle more effective on a daily basis. check out the web web site listed decrease than and also you'll see what a actual danger this truly is and also you'd be disturbed and worried even more effective. yet, merely to console you slightly, there are selection realities already in the works which will look after and save the voters of the united states. we are no longer completely executed in as yet. there remains wish. Peace, Love, person-friendly i'm Dartagnon

2016-11-25 01:26:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Martial law is a state of affairs where the citizens are under the control of the military, rather than the local government. Martial law means things like mandatory curfews, shoot-on-sight orders, and summary jailings and executions.

It's really only worthwhile in the case of riots and such.

2006-08-14 14:33:58 · answer #5 · answered by Brian L 7 · 1 0

It's when the military assumes law enfocment duties of a nation or a city. This would occur during a natural disaster or a threat to national security. The pros are more security, the cons are the public won't like it.

2006-08-14 14:34:41 · answer #6 · answered by Wocka wocka 6 · 1 0

the pros to this is that you can help keep the population safe while the wars hitting your home town, and the cons are that it is so potent form of law that it can only be used when tanks are rolling in front of your house so to speak.

2006-08-14 14:36:11 · answer #7 · answered by bbqchezit 2 · 0 0

It's what the Democrats claim Americans are living under any time they (the Democrats) are out of power.

2006-08-14 15:16:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers