48 hrs if you are lucky
2006-08-14 14:28:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 hours...that's how long it took after the cease-fire began for israeli soldiers to fire on hezbollah militiamen...and israel has vowed that anyone traveling back into southern lebanon faces the threat of attack...so, coupled with the hezbollah rocket launches, this could be a very short lull in the fighting...already there is grumbling in tel aviv that the fighting was stopped too soon...
2006-08-14 14:37:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by spike missing debra m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say a cease fire is only allowing them time to recoup, and time for those sad Lebanese civilians to move back into dangerous areas they should avoid.
If Israel just had the backing and time they needed to wipe out Hezbollah then maybe we could put THIS conflict to rest. Although iam pretty sure iran and/or syria would pick up where they left off.
2006-08-14 14:31:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by amosunknown 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is there any doubt that the only ones the rest of the world expects to stop fighting is the Israelis? Hezbollah will kill many Jews and when Israel finally has enough and goes back to hunting them down the world will point its finger and call them warmongers.
2006-08-14 14:31:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Edward F 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It really hasn't started since Hezbollah continues to fire rockets. I won't consider the cease fire in effect until there have been no rockets fired by either side for at least 48hrs.
2006-08-14 14:31:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by mocha5isfree 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
From what i will tell (the arguments overlap, are ambiguous, and can bypass returned centuries in case you opt for to delve into religous rhetoric): Mass exodus of Jews submit-WW2, moved into land that British owned below the Mandate of Palestine, kicking out households who have been already there. when you consider that 1948 the recent state of Israel has been attempting to strengthen its borders, attacking neighbouring international locations and killing its own electorate (this unquestionably constitutes terrorism). Israel's properly coordinated massacres and thefts of land have been happening for years. Survivors who lost their properties are scuffling with returned (particularly particularly, thinking the help (money and weapons) the U. S. and Europe has given Israel), that's why there's a conflict. in case you relatively need to comprehend the placement i'd propose examining books, and heading off mainstream media which during the years has been unashamedly biased in direction of Israel (probably as a results of fact of financial pressures and threats).
2016-10-02 02:20:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by montijo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hopefully long enough to get the majority of innocents out of the firing line. But knowing Israel and terrorists, it won't last even that long. Both sides seem to take pleasure out of killing innocent ppl.
2006-08-14 14:32:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anna 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no Hezbollah is a bunch of thugs that have Lebanon scarred to death! they do what they want. They don't care who dies as long as Israel gets blamed for it.
2006-08-14 14:30:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
How long will it take IRAN to re-supply Hezbollah with rockets and ammo?
2006-08-14 14:32:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1 week, after taking a little break to reload and convince of their side to the world, it's back to the same-old in the middle east
2006-08-14 14:30:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by bbqchezit 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my office pool, I had 6:00 pm EST today.
2006-08-14 14:29:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Steve R 3
·
0⤊
0⤋