2006-08-14 12:48:59 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. Bush's Political Survival in the course of History depends on how good he is in keeping secret the true intent of offshore invasion using the pretext of terror threats.
2006-08-14 12:55:32 · answer #1 · answered by Petals 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was surely at the time until the majority of people of democratic countries did not understand threats of these alleged threats on civil rights and fightings, which multiply terrorism itself. The situation became absolutely opposite now. Even Sub-Saharian Africa is able to understand very well the whole degradation of USA policy. It is also clear that all this policy was continued not only during the presidency of Bush and that he is only a good boy of all this mechanism. USA has a chance to understand implications or to continue to convert to a true canibal.
2006-08-14 19:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he feels he is justified in the war when more threats come to the surface to the public, but Presidents in war times always feel the wrath of the people. He is going down.
2006-08-14 19:52:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter whether or not Bush has political survival... he is president no matter how low the polls go until the next election.
2006-08-14 19:51:50 · answer #4 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes - expect the terror threat alerts to go up just before any election. You are one of the few Americans who is thinking (the rest of us are sheep).
2006-08-14 19:51:44 · answer #5 · answered by M S 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if you replace political survival by political image i will 100% agree with you,the fake story about mass destruction weapons in Iraq was just one chapter of his terror book
2006-08-14 20:21:39 · answer #6 · answered by shosholov 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What political survival??? He won't be up for re-election-he is in the White House....
Good grief.
2006-08-14 19:53:14 · answer #7 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush CANNOT RUN AGAIN! Clinton did not understand this either. Presidents are limited to TWO terms or ten years total!!!
2006-08-14 19:51:31 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it absolutely does, considering that National security is the only thing his people trust him on. I would take note of how popular he was on 9/11.
2006-08-14 19:59:18 · answer #9 · answered by Kalin D 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - his political survival is guarenteed for over two more years. However, a republican majority on the house and senate might.
2006-08-14 19:51:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋