http://www.alternet.org/
2006-08-14 12:48:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Hell yes. Without terrorism Bush would have no platform. He would have nothing to be remembered by. His main goal when he got into office was not " how to better the country", It was " How to pay back the man that shot at my daddy". We have yet to find weapons of mass destruction. And if we went over there to liberate the Iraqi's then why are we not in Sudan. Those people are being slaughtered by the thousands. But yet the United States is busy liberating people that have not and did not ask for our help. Bush ignores the real problems and creates his own. I PERSONALLY feel like he needs to grow the hell up and take responsibilty for putting this country in the situation it is in now.
2006-08-14 13:09:16 · answer #1 · answered by ~daTexasPrincess~ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It's an interesting question, because it may seem that way currently. If the terrorist attacks did not happy, everyone probably wouldn't hate George so much. I don't like him either. But within 9 months after taking office, he was dealt with the most unprecendented thing this country has ever experienced. Sure, Democrats say that they could have handled everything better from the PATRIOT Act to the war in Iraq. Maybe so. They would have handled it a lot differently. But maybe it would not have been better. Who knows? Nobody. In November of this year, we will find out what the voters think. I say let's vote some Democrats into office to balance out the Congress. Maybe it's time to give the Democrats a shot at terrorism. Republicans have had complete control over everything that happens since 9/11. Maybe the Democrats will fail miserably. Maybe they won't. But Bush is doing the best he can. That's no defense of his actions. I don't like our President. But he doesn't DEPEND on terrorism to survive. Every day he wishes the terrorists hadn't attacked, and his presidency and approval ratings would be exponentially better.
2006-08-14 19:53:33 · answer #2 · answered by surfer2966 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do terrorist's depend on Bush to survive?
2006-08-14 19:55:24 · answer #3 · answered by Suspended 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. If he didnt terrorize the american people ( making them afraid of constant terror threats) He couldnt survive.
2006-08-14 19:56:23 · answer #4 · answered by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
absolutely 100%
2006-08-14 20:02:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, but Clinton need sex to survive but not from his wife
2006-08-14 19:54:44 · answer #6 · answered by Ladder Captain-29 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
terrorism, oil, lies, giving false hopes, etc..he's an A**.
2006-08-14 19:55:35 · answer #7 · answered by Ms_♥ 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
uh hello good concept it took you this long to figure that out
2006-08-14 19:54:43 · answer #8 · answered by mc_1_2000 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
perhaps?but if i ever had the chance i would kick him in the behind!fact-judgei2
2006-08-14 19:56:11 · answer #9 · answered by Judge 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
More idiots on the internet!!!!!!!!
2006-08-14 20:00:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋