if you havent found the truth yet, go here: http://911research.wtc7.net/materials/early/flyer/flyer.pdf
read carefully and think of the possibility that the government was in charge of the demolishion of the world trade center, in an elaborate scheme to blame terrorists of the middle east, go to war and in turn raise oil and gas prices signifigantly.
think about it? a plane demoloshing 2 giant steel reinforced buldings? its impossible. go to that site and read the proof and how the gov, and femas explanations dont match up.
2006-08-14
12:03:45
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
butterflies read the page. those buildings couldve handles 3 more of the same planes and still hold up. they were designed to handle planes of the same size or larger carrying much more fuel. and a fire never caused a building collapse.
thanks to all of those who agree.
2006-08-14
12:13:54 ·
update #1
to those of who who havent done research on the scandal or havent read rom the link i posted you might as well not comment. read at least the first few paragraphs and youll see my point.
2006-08-14
12:16:08 ·
update #2
the extremely frightening part of it all is that the government was willing to sacrifice the lives of everyone in those buildings and planes for a few bucks. the fact that that kind of government rules over us is what scares me.
2006-08-14
12:20:32 ·
update #3
I do find it suspicious that this did happen not far into Bush's almost non-existent term. It sure did boost his popularity for a while didn't it? And who are some of his big friends? The oil guys.
2006-08-14 12:21:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by craigash7 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Unfortunately questions like this will come under fire from various angles. I agree that there was something amiss on 9/11.
I think that http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html this is an important photo to see. It has clear evidence of the demolition theory in action. People say it was the floors going, but why was the smoke only protruding from that one floor and not any of the floors above which would evidently have collapsed on top of it. I've visited this site before and read through it a few times, it does leave you asking a few questions. If these buildings were designed to withstand such an event - why did they collapse?
I think there has been a lot of lies to "protect" the public from 9/11, and unanswered piles of questions for the US Government to answer. Warmongering? Until they decide to tell the truth and reveal what they've been hiding, theories will continue to be dismissed by people who have just been subject to a whitewashed media.
2006-08-14 12:42:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm curious how the government snuck into the WTC without being noticed by WTC security and thousands of employees before 9/11 and cut the steel reinforcements ON EVERY FLOOR with huge steel cutters and planted the thousands of needed pounds of explosives on each floor in order to get the building to fall like it did. It must have taken weeks- BUT then how did the cut steel reinforcements keep the building up when they weren't designed to do so while cut? If it took weeks to cut the steel reinforcements, and the steel reinforcements were neccesary to keep the building up, how did the building stay up after they were cut but before 9/11? Anyone who thinks the government did this is an engineering moron.
2006-08-14 12:48:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
okay, first I'll ask you, why would any architect design a building to withstand a plane crash? let alone several of them at once? who would foresee that when they designed a building? second if all of the "evidence" was carted away then how do you arrive at your answers? where's your proof if the "evidence" is all gone? Planes crashed into the buildings, tall buildings, they fell, lots of people died. why is that so hard to accept? final question, what makes you think the buildings were built the way they were suppose to be built. oh of course not, it couldn't be possible that some one took a short cut, contractors never do that, buildings are always built right, they couldn't possibly have fallen, in part, because the contractor took a shortcut and built them weaker then they were actually designed.
2006-08-14 13:01:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by thelogicalferret 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I appreciate your right to say what you think, but I disagree totally. By the way, use the spell check. You sound educated, you should present your case that way also. Also, the Government never agrees with anyone and FEMA showed it's total lack of preparedness during 9/11 as well as Hurricane Katrina. Everyone was in "CYA" mode, does anyone really think they would agree?
2006-08-14 12:13:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michele D 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Are you serious? Get real. Planes hit the buildings, weakened the structures, the buildings collapsed, and 3000 of my friends and neighbors died. You are overwhelmed by a fantastical and unrealistic story and have forgotten the sad, heart-wrenching reality.
2006-08-14 12:36:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by maguire1202 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Watch Loose Change - Click the link below.
2006-08-14 12:09:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by jasenlee 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is NOT impossible. Those buildings were extremely tall. You can't tell me that jetliners going extremely fast did not weaken the buildings.....I refuse to believe that. I don't like George Bush but even I DON'T BELIEVE THAT STUFF. This is almost like "Elvis still lives" as far as I'm concerned.
2006-08-14 12:08:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by butterfliesRfree 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
The more a person thinks about it the more questions come up. Interesting question.
2006-08-14 12:27:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pop D 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's painfully obvious our own government orchestrated 9-11. Anyone who believes to the contrary are either blind or stupid...or both.
WhatReallyHappened.com
LooseChange911.com
2006-08-14 12:09:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋