how can you argue against a theory that you haven't researched for yourself? if you're only familiar with one or two pieces of the research, how can you effectively disprove it? for example- does proving that cell phones work on airplanes really disprove the theory (not that i've ever read anything that really used the "cell phones don't work on planes" argument to prove the theory)? how many people that don't believe that the US government played some sort of role in either perpetrating the attack, or allowing it to occur have actually read even 1 book about the subject? what was it?
2006-08-14
12:03:27
·
9 answers
·
asked by
list
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics