I think it was just an accident and a real tragedy. She was in deed one of the kindest people that ever lived.
2006-08-14 11:14:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dorrie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It was all just very convenient really so I have always thought conspiracy. I think the biggest tragedy was that she was taken in the prime of her life and her sons lives. How heartless can the Royals be to take the heir to the thrones mother off him. She was way better than the horse face he's got now.
I think it was convenient at the time. Things were getting cosier with Dodi, she was starting to make headlines, she may or may not have been pregnant, she was stealing attention from the Royal family, she was a favourite etc.
I think she was just the young sacrifical virgin that got dumped when the Royals had looked like they had done right. Camilla was always there.
2006-08-14 16:17:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by gretphemelger 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that it was an accident. It was a tragic thing that happened. The papprazzi was partly to blame as well as the driver of the car cause he was drunk. If the papparazzi hadnt being chasing Dianas and Dodis car the accident prolly woulnt have happened. Im sick and tired of all these conspiracy theories surrounding Diana and Dodis death. It was an unfortunate and tragic accident. People need to let this die down and move on. Let Diana and Dodi rest in peace
2006-08-14 12:16:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by mystic rain 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree, it become an twist of destiny brought about with the aid of a inebriated driver and the victims did no longer have seat belts on. The crash ought to definitely have led to no fatalities if the motorized vehicle had crashed in yet otherwise. Prince Charles has no powers to reserve safe practices brokers round. No infant become stumbled on contained in the French post-mortem, why ought to France help the united kingdom in this? the showering of the line become to eliminate blood that persons ought to have gawped at. Why ought to the employ a Papparazi to help them? How extra unreliable are you able to get? He become there to photo Diana particularly? % of automobile sixty 5 mph - who says this? Why is it area of a conspiracy? the speed ought to were sixty 5, that is rather quick to enter a tunnel at the same time as turning a nook and taking position a hill once you're inebriated, and a hell of a % to hit concrete at. i do not study Eric Petel, perhaps he gave the impression to be replacing his tale or making issues up, police officials are used to recognizing unreliable witnesses, that is their pastime.
2016-12-06 13:21:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The idea of a conspiracy simply justs gives the public a view- and a conspiracy idea can also be a coverup. I believe it was an accident from a human mistake.
2006-08-14 14:12:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Fortune Cookie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
conspiracy
I think Prince Charles should have given up his right to the throne when he married his mistress.. The marriage, made 'royal', is so wrong, in so many ways..
I for one, miss the Princess Diana.. she seemed the only true royal there.
2006-08-14 11:15:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by sassy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Accidents
2006-08-18 08:59:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by lanie1713 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Conspiracy --so Charles could marry Bow Wow Camilla.
2006-08-14 15:54:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by jiffypop88 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Diana was a gift given to lighten the world. she came and left when she finished her assignment. It was an accident and she was destined to go that way.
2006-08-15 04:06:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by nnenna e 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
hi :p all i can really said is R.I.P. Diana and all those ppl famous or not who died in vain. :( But it seems like it was a set up just take a look at some of the past tragedies.
2006-08-18 05:16:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋