Why does most new music suck?

Question

It seems like the radio stations dont play good music anymore unless its from the 70's-90's timeline. Are we really doomed to a million crappy Nickleback and Metallica clones?

Answer 1

Good question. Most of it really does suck.

Our standards have been lowered by the fact that anyone with a lot of money can have a writer & a producer come up with something that fits a particular "formula for success" & then go into a studio and have his/her voice recorded & perfected.

After that, the "musician" will have his/her video played on MTV and voted on by a bunch of kids who don't realize that it can't be "Total Request Live" if the request isn't LIVE and there're actually just 20 pre-selected songs to chose from.

Next, the radio starts playing the terrible "song" because they get paid by the guy who paid MTV to list the song as an option on TRL or whatever. Then everyone says, "Wow, that's a really good song," & people start buying it because it's prominetly displayed at Best Buy as a "HOT NEW RELEASE!"

It's a vicious cycle.

Answer 2

Why: Big bucks. They don't take music seriously nowadays. They get a few people together and form a band with loud guitars and drums, give themselves some weird name and yell into the mic (they call it singing, and the words are unintelligible because the gain on their sound system is at the max). Why people like this stuff is beyond my reasoning.

The best music is from the 40s to the 90s. Thank goodness some stations still realize that. My solution is to buy all the good music tapes/dvds you can find and forget the radio.

You can call me an old fuddy-duddy, but I still have my hearing.

Answer 3

Ours is the first generation that would rather listen to our parents' (or even older) music than our own. Kids today listen to the Beatles and Zep, who broke up and/or died before they were born. When I was in college, Sinatra was huge. What's going on?

My personal theory is that music classes stopped being given in public schools as budgets were tightened. At my high school alone, we lost two choirs in the 1980s, each of which had been around for more than 20 years.

Without formal music education, well, kids could still sing. But they could not play anything like a guitar or piano. So they taught themselves to program synthesizers and drum machines, which are basically computers.

Also, they did not learn music theory, so they could not compose any new material, only cover and sample existing songs and spin turntables with existing records.

It's not that kids today will not learn skills through patience and hard work. They still learn sports-- our athletes can stand alongside the greats of our parents' generation. And sports take as much discipline as music.

It's not that kids today are dumber than before. We're the ones who teach our parents how to use computers and how to set the DVR.

No, I think it's just because music-- and the arts in general-- are devalued in our educational system.

If you want music that is both recent and decent, check out the world of contemporary folk music. Some names to start with: John Gorka, Pierce Pettis, David Wilcox, Shawn Colvin, Dar Williams, and Suzanne Vega. For a harder edge and electric guitar, try Billy Bragg.

And don't forget that fantastic music is being made outside of America, too! For "foreign" music that still uses English words, try getting into reggae and its current spinoffs, like dancehall.

Answer 4

No - Blue October is a great new band - as well as Buckcherry - so we are not doomed

- The fact is though that, Clear Channel and Acumulous Stations are large conglamorates and they have a certain play list of songs - NO FREEDOM - to decide what to play - like college stations

- So it sounds that you are stuck in a bad area with these major stations......my suggestion is to go to the college you are near and try to start a college station and play what you want - We have just started our station here in ND and we play what we like and we have been getting a lot of listeners -

- So the answer is no, New music doesn't suck - it just doesn't get played

Answer 5

Unfortunately this is nothing new. Pop music has always sucked. In the 1990s, they were playing crappy songs from the 1960s-1980s -- and we were doomed to listen to Molly Hatchet and the Jackson 5.

There have always been alternative music outlets. Thes days, it is my iPod.

Answer 6

Alot of the music you hear now a days has beats and melodies taken from older music. Almost any song you have now, if you slow it down or take some things out, you can hear the same beat as another song. So basically it's all repeated, in some sense.

Answer 7

i believe u thoroughly! todays music has no soul! eccpecially that rap sh*t! what the f*** is soulja boy! some new music is rather stable yet its no longer as stable as music from th 60s and 70s. ive continuously seen myself to have been born in the incorrect era. im like this form of hippie. and im 13. im a brilliant fan of the beatles, jimi hendrix, queen, poison, and all music from the 50s-90s. i prefer i ought to bypass returned to the 60s or 80s or 40s or consistent with probability even 20s. those situations regarded lots relaxing. and that i dont see what the super deal is with hannah montana and the jonas bros. theyre so gay! and theyre extra directed in direction of sons and daughters yet all and sundry makes a brilliant deal approximately them.

Answer 8

even all these idol talent shows that are on tv make the performers use recycled music instead of encouraging something new to happen.

Answer 9

Bad music invades every time period. It is the time that shakes loose the crap and leaves the gems.

Answer 10

Metallica were good pre-Black album. But I agree