2006-08-14 08:46:14 · 4 answers · asked by Jackie P 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Axl Rose of course, Scott Weiland is nothing but a Heroin promoter..........Loser!
2006-08-14 08:54:13 · answer #1 · answered by nahimana34 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Axl Rose. Scott Weiland cannot come close to touching the talent of Axl. There can't be a G n' R w/out Axl but there can be without the rest of the original members. Don't get me wrong it'd be great if those guys were still together but they aren't. Scott Weiland is a waste, he is bad publicity for Velvet Revolver. I think Slash and Duff could have found a better singer for that band. Slash is an icredible guitar player, would love to see him and Axl work out their differences.
2006-08-14 16:00:46 · answer #2 · answered by Rod 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Scott seems much more artistic to me. Maybe it was the drugs, but whatever it was...it worked for Scott. Axl is/was a great performer, but I enjoyed the music and lyrics of Stone Temple Pilots more than the "screaming" of Guns n' Roses!
2006-08-14 15:52:03 · answer #3 · answered by allknowing 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Scott Weiland, because he won't try to revive STP with all-new members.
2006-08-14 15:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋