they found missles which hit the towers lauched from the plane... and some breaches on the wtc7. also, the hole in the pentagon is much smaller than the plane is...
2006-08-14 08:15:50 · 22 answers · asked by Peter McKoy 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Oh my God, give me a break. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
2006-08-14 08:19:28 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I've not heard about missiles hitting the towers but the Loose Change documentary shows there were large pods underneath both planes, and they appear to explode just before each plane hit the building.
There's so much evidence to suggest the official truth is a lie that only a fool would outright deny a conspiracy.
2006-08-14 15:32:46 · answer #2 · answered by James H 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course it is a conspiracy. The official inquiry clearly states that Al Queda conspired to hijack these aircraft and crash them into the WTC and the Pentagon.
Now, whether this is how the attacks transpired, or whether there was involvement of some secretive American cabal in high places that conspired to allow the attacks to take place, it was still a CONSPIRACY!!!
How come people have so much trouble with that word? What do you pay your taxes for????
The CIA are paid billions of dollars to create conspiracies all over the world, it is a major part of what they do.
They collude in secret to do harm to our enemies and advance the interests of the USA. It is their JOB! It is their prime function!
Al queda conspire to do harm, MI6 conspire to do harm. It is what these organisations where created for.
It just shows how brainwashed a large proportion of the public is when they 'do not believe in conspiracies'!!!
2006-08-14 15:31:11 · answer #3 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe it was conspiracy but I never have seen anything substantiating 'missles hitting the towers'. That is a new one.
Archemedes...the popular mechanics crap has already been responded to -
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html
http://www.rense.com/general62/ppop.htm
and why does everyone have a ***** of this PM article from 05. if this stuff were really valid, why aren't any other major magazines (maybe scientific american) debunking what happened?
2006-08-14 15:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by DEP 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Everything is a conspiracy...Pearl Harbor was a conspiracy too. Riiiight.
Didn't Charlie Sheen spearhead this theory? The first time I heard about it was when he was being interviewed by someone a few months ago.
Pleeeease. The world is in a sad, sad state when we start taking what Charlie Sheen says seriously.
2006-08-14 15:32:35 · answer #5 · answered by Steelergirl 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes ! I give up,I was the mad bomber.I also am a magician and I made my plane disappear once I sky dived out of it,directing another bomb on the upper floors of the tower..lol .Old Bill C. and I came up with a great scheme.
2006-08-14 15:26:03 · answer #6 · answered by pretzgolf 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Do you live anywhere near NY or Washington? I doubt you'd be proposing missiles hitting the towers if you did.
2006-08-14 15:20:03 · answer #7 · answered by maguire1202 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Enough!
Don't get your news from blogs, just because you read it on the internet, doesn't make it true. Here is a legitimate link to a Popular Mechanics "de-bunking" study.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1&c=y
Some people just watch too much X-Files or something.
2006-08-14 15:22:29 · answer #8 · answered by archimedes_crew 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wow, that's conclusive evidence. Much better than bin Ladin taking credit for it on camera.
2006-08-14 15:21:47 · answer #9 · answered by ThePeter 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
hmm u need to better word your question cause it was obviously a conspiracy done by evil people.
2006-08-14 15:19:39 · answer #10 · answered by ms_fantastico 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋