English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The reports about the alleged plot to blow up planes leaving London have been very very vague. Is this making anybody else suspicious? Is this a repeat of the Guildford Four and an attempt to keep us all in a state of fear?

2006-08-14 06:26:26 · 20 answers · asked by bregweidd 6 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

everything is possible. too many unanswered questions about 9/11 makes people suspicious. Hope the truth will come out soon.

2006-08-14 06:32:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We should all be suspicious now a days who knows what is real and what is changed for the shake of calmness in United States and in London. With the discovering of the alleged plot to blow up planes in the sky, the suspects that were detained a couple with a child was set to aboard one of the planes using the baby formula.

2006-08-14 06:45:41 · answer #2 · answered by Moni 2 · 0 0

I don't know what the Guildford Four is about. I tend to believe this plot because there was a similar one broken up by President Bill Clinton's intelligence team in the 1990's, it planned to blow up 10 747's over the Pacific. His intelligence team also broke up plots to blow up LAX and the Seattle Space Needle. George W. Bush broke up that intelligence team as one of his first acts upon having the Presidency stolen for him by crooked Republicans on the "Supreme Court".

2006-08-14 06:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0 0

There hasn't been anything vauge about the reports - actually they've been quite specific in terms of the detail of the plot, the timetable of the plot, and the method in which the planes were going to be brought down.

This was the real deal, it's not an attempt to have us in a state of fear..

2006-08-14 06:34:05 · answer #4 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 1 0

Actually, "Charlooch", four alleged plotters have been freed for the moment, as reported in my local newspaper this morning. That doesn't mean they are innocent, just that British intelligence and the police were pressed to act before they wanted to, because attacks were reported to be imminent. As a result, there may not be enough hard evidence for conviction, but at least the attacks haven't happened.

2006-08-14 06:38:24 · answer #5 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0 1

Absolutely, journalist in England are questioning the timing and the fact that they have been branded terrorist before a trial or facts presented. All they have to go by is what the government states. And yet 2 of the alleged suspects have been freed. A fact not covered by the media in this country.

2006-08-14 06:32:12 · answer #6 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 1 1

I am only suspicious of greedy journalists who will put forth someones whacked out theory in order to gain headlines or TV ratings.

Sorry if a job well done by British Intelligence doesn't make long lasting extreme press.

2006-08-14 06:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by Love2Sew 5 · 0 0

Guildford Four made the public feel safer thinking the terrorists were in prison.

2006-08-14 06:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0 0

This is the result of the constant complaints the lib's did after 9/11, and how the government did not react upon intelligence of a terrorist attack plot.

Funny, now that they react, you gotta complain even more? What exactly is it you want?

2006-08-14 06:49:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Seem to remember how ghost stories were used to keep one younger person in bed. How did group that allowed 911 to happen become best group for fitting dog with bullet proof protection.

2006-08-14 06:43:19 · answer #10 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers