Is the scientific notion of cause the best?
~It states cause and effects have to be related.
~It starts off with a particular event and culminates in another.
~Both the events are someway connected i.e. the simple example of smoke and fire where fire isn't present without smoke.
~Effects are uniform if the same causes are presented i.e. if a set of people are given a same cause they will come up with the same result(the obvious argument is where does individual differences come in play? but i need some more too).
~It is one sided i.e. the cause can only cause the effect and not vice versa. for e.g the process of curdling. Milk curdles to form curd, but curd cant be changed back to milk.
~No plurality of causes exist i.e. One cause has only one effect and every effect has only one cause.
Please suggest arguments for this view...
2006-08-14
06:21:03
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Myth
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy