Stephen Jackson and Ronnie Brown.
2 young backs that are talented and will be in the NFl for a long time.
2006-08-14 06:26:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tranuine 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Rudi Johnson, Stephen Jackson and Ronnie Brown have the same potential Fantasy points. There is only ONE difference now and that is MIAMI has a QB who is known for passing than rushing. How this impacts Ronnie Brown? I dont know. Ronnie Brown is also dealing with an injury from last season.
St. Louis has newly designed their offense more towards the rush. Cinci, is going to stay consistent with last years numbers.
What I would look at is their schedule. It looks like Cincinatti has the tougher schedule of the 3. The RAMS seem to have the easiest schedule. The Dolphins are up and down.
My final analysis would recommend:
1. Stephen Jackson
2. Ronnie Brown
3. Rudi Johnson
2006-08-14 07:29:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eltownzjem 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's pretty much a toss up this early.
I'd definitely keep Ronnie Brown. No more splitting carries with Ricky Williams anymore and he's going to have a monster year.
The other two are toss ups with ups and downs for each.
Rudi Johnson is in a good offense, and with the possibility of Carson Palmer out, defenses could play more for the run against them. However, he's a great back and gets plenty of goal line touches.
Stephen Jackson could be the next big thing and have a break out year. The only question is his durability. No more Marshall Faulk and the Rams have said they want to re-commit to the running game.
So, all in all, I'd go Ronnie Brown and Stephen Jackson. But, like I said, it doesn't really make a difference. They are all going to put up similar numbers. Whoever stays the healthiest. Go with your gut!
2006-08-14 08:44:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Ronnie Brown in this situation. Both are young, both no longer have to share carries, which put's them equal. I still think that St. Louis is more of a passing offense. Miami is invested in Ronnie, he is only 2 year vet, he has alot of football let- and he is just one of those guys that you are going to hear about for years. Not the Steven Jackson will do bad, but Ronnie is just a better workhorse back. For a keeper league, you will want Brown.
2016-03-27 01:28:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
R. Brown and S. Jackson as they are two emerging backs. They're better than Johnson alone plus they now have the backfield all to themselves. Chris Perry was the 26th pick (Jackson was 24th in that draft, equal talents?) so trust me, they are going to definetly use him more. Perry is a great running back and he'll see more playing time which means less for Johnson.
Brown and Jackson!
2006-08-18 04:36:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely Ronnie Brown, the guy is a future stud, and it is a toss up between the other two but I would probably go with Jackson because he is younger.
2006-08-14 07:03:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by road_dawg_style 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Keep Jackson and Johnson. If Brown stays healthy he'll probably score a comparable amount as these two, but he's far more likely to get injured than either of them. Brown showed last year that he gets worn down and, without Williams, they don't have any good backs to spell him.
2006-08-14 08:18:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stephen and Ronnie
2006-08-14 11:41:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by peteypablo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great choices. I'd keep Jackson and Johnson. The Dolphins are a little hard to figure, not knowing if Culpepper will bounce back quickly.
2006-08-14 06:35:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by FatElvis 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
forsure Ronnie Brown and probably jackson over jhonson
2006-08-14 06:55:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Uallsuck 2
·
1⤊
0⤋