alright idc if he our perz. i think he is doing a horrible job meann look at our country before him and his father. no wars no attacks. now all of a sudden we got attacked when his father was in charge i think we should impeach him. We are in war because the attacks when his dad was in there now hes showing "DADDY DEAREST" that he can fight. thats wrong punishing the world and ecspeailly us to prove to his dad that heis strong. Let us give him a gun and let himfight for him self. am i right?
2006-08-14 06:08:17 · 15 answers · asked by Blue Eyes 4 U 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
don't make fun of my spelling god im only 14
2006-08-14 06:21:29 · update #1
ok I'm sorry about the spelling and **** i was vocieing my opinon and like ther was a guy asking if Greoge had sex with little boys goats and his own dog soo atack him not me
2006-08-14 06:24:26 · update #2
Well, I am not a big fan of George Bush, and I did not vote for him. However, your reasoning isn't exactly sound, and you don't point out actual facts and truths with sources.
I agree with you, but you need to back it up.
2006-08-14 06:14:19 · answer #1 · answered by AnswerMom 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO you're wrong-Actually the blame for 9/11 can be blamed on Clinton- also don't you remember Desert Storm? That was a war. also the last time the United states was attacked on our own soil was a Pearl Harbor.. Without all the news media documenting every civilians death, Our country was able to actually go in and fight , now everything is questioned and our soldiers are not allowed to fight or defend this country without first defending any military action to the world.You are not too young to remember 9/11 and now the British stop a plot that included blowing up 10 airliners , What do YOU think Bush should do.. Personally , I back Bush.. Who else has had to deal with this kind of Terror and deal with it politically correct?
2006-08-14 13:57:52 · answer #2 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A little clarification here: George Bush the Elder or George Bush the Younger are not to blame for 9/11. That can be laid at Bill Clinton's feet.
Bill Clinton tried to intervene in Somolia and would not send end the full compliment of the military that had been deployed for that particular situation and because he would not send in the additional military needed we lost good men, we got beaten badly.
Osama Bin Ladin was watching those events very closely and concluded that because of Clinton's failure to send in the rest of the troops that the U.S.A. was weak-willed, would not fight and would not respond to a direct, violent terrorist attack on the U.S.A.
2006-08-14 13:18:49 · answer #3 · answered by Albannach 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, on a couple of levels.
No, I am not a Dubya fan by any means. I did have some respect for his father.
We were attacked during the Reagen years, not the Bush 1 ones. Kuwait was attacked during those.
We were also in a silly little war called Vietnam back when the Dems were in control.
The problem really is, impeaching the shrub does not do any good. The bastard running the country is Cheney.
Now is there enough time before end of term to impeach both of them?
-Dio
2006-08-14 13:17:45 · answer #4 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Last time we were attacked was in 1941. Our President was Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a ward-heeling politician, an anti-semite and an isolationist. We all stood with him against the axis powers. Why are so-called "Americans" unwilling to do that now against the equally evil power of world terrorism?
2006-08-14 13:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No...you're wrong
Al-Queda had been a threat for a long time. Clinton administration knew of them. They just hit us bigtime on 911.
I'd rather have Bush than Kerry. And I really doubt anyone is that much of a daddy's boy. Gimmie a break
2006-08-14 13:13:55 · answer #6 · answered by Jasmine 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You need reason to impeach other than you don't like him. I can't understand the rest of your question.
2006-08-14 13:16:13 · answer #7 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It would be great if all the kings and presidents and ministers fought wars by themselves!
2006-08-14 13:14:36 · answer #8 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1) Is English your second language?
2) This post is gibberish.
2006-08-14 13:15:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
First of all, you need to learn to spell, write, and communicate. You don't even know what you're talking about.
2006-08-14 13:14:43 · answer #10 · answered by surelycoolgirl 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋