With your obvious intelligence perhaps you could actually be the first person to prove without a doubt that the science of astrology is bunk. Why don't you study it thoroughly as to how it relates to your own life so you can do just that?
2006-08-14 06:14:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by slippped 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Can't help but notice: Sept 11, 2001.
In the New York newspapers, in the Boston newspapers, in the Washington DC newspapers, not one single prediction for any of the Zodiacal signs on any of the Astrology columns contained ANY warnings about staying out of real tall buildings, or five-sided buildings, nor about "STAY THE HELL OFF THEM BIG JET AIRPLANES!"
You'd kinda think that IF it wasn't bullshit, somebody would've noticed the impending three thousand deaths.
2006-08-14 19:23:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by L.V. Ames 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I don't think that.
Accurate Astrology is individualized and based on 3 things:
Your birth date
Your birth place coordinates
Your exact time of birth
Sun sign horoscopes in the newspapers and online are not accurate because they are generalized and not specific to the individual in question.
For a reading:
http://www.astro.com
Input your birth data (date, place and exact birth time) under "My Astro"
Select "Free Horoscopes".
Select "Astro Click Portrait" for a Natal (birth) Chart interpretation.
Select "Forecast" and "Personal Daily Horoscope" for a Transit reading (predictions).
This is accurate and free. Enjoy!
2006-08-14 20:44:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by astroleolady 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
funny..I've heard it Horrible-scope, but never Asstrology..Have you heard of Nostro-dumb-***??
oh boy the times we live in!!
2006-08-14 17:08:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lunny2006 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd like to kick Uranus.
2006-08-14 18:53:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by mitch 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you might considering putting your reasoning behind this in the details....i don't believe in them, but they are plesant to read b/c they are always positive.
2006-08-14 13:13:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by French Mouse 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-08-14 13:42:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by samantha wilson 5
·
0⤊
0⤋