Do the extremities of the two major political parties represent your views as an American?

Question

What happened? Usually, the two parties have always fluctuated, through out history, going from 'radical' to 'moderate'. In the end they both push themselves in and out of the 'moderate range' of the 'political spectrum'(at least they did). Is it me or have they both fallen 'out of touch' with the American Public? Isn't there a case to be made that just short of cold-blooded killing, both parties are reaching 'extreme radical levels'? Is it so bad to say that the majority of 'party liners' have been dooped into believeing that they are as radical as their party has gotten?

I want all sides here... I'd love to hear from anyone who has a REAL ANSWER... whether you agree or disagree.

Thanks in advance.

Sorry, I type too fast and I misspelled some stuff there..... oh well.

Very Good.. you are right.. 'American' was the improper term... but you know what I was talking about... thank you for that because I will not do it ever again..... blah, blah, blah.

Answer 1

Sorry no political party represents the views of any American.

Of citizens of any given country yes, but not for any 'American'

There is no such a thing as ‘American’ nationality, America is not a nation America is a continent with many nations in it. The US never named itself the name of the United States is a designation it comes from the end of the Declaration of Independence, "WE, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in GENERAL CONGRESS, Assembled...". The preamble to the U.S. Constitution reiterated the phrase: "We the People of the United States..." (The authors of these two documents probably used the phrase "united states" in place of a list of colonies/states because they remained uncertain at the time of drafting which colonies/states would sign off on the sentiments therein.) The geographic term "America" specifies the states' home on the American continent.

It is therefor incorrect to refer to US citizens as Americans with the intent of denoting citizenship, or the United States as America with the intent of denoting a nation. Americans have a term for US citizens, we are called United Statesians by the rest of Americans, to say American with the intent of denoting citizenship or America when we mean the United States reflects poorly on our attitude towards the 70% of Americans that are not United Statesians.

Answer 2

Fantatical ideology is bad. It doesn't matter which side of the political sprectrum it comes from. I do not think either party truly represents the moderates, of which the majority in the country are. However, unless people begin to actually voice dissent by voting for independents, the party faithful are what you have to choose from. The trick is in finding the person, not political party, which will best represent your views. I view the devisive nature of politics as a tool. By keeping people focused against one another the business of government goes on largely unabated. The politcal system in this country has been usurped by lobbyists. If you have enough money to invest, you can get almost any legislation you want. We need reform in the political system, term limits, and an end to lobbying would be a good place to start, but I wouldn't hold my breath because just like on Congressional pay issues, legislators are not going to vote to kill the golden goose. You should not be distressed though, voters in the United States are more shrewd than the fantics give them credit for, and usually make the right decisions for the time period in question. We are as strong now as we ever were, and the United States of America will continue on it's journey through history for a lone time to come.

Answer 3

I am a Republican but the truth is that neither party gives a damn about the constituents. The theory was that since it was too hard for the people to all vote so a "Congressman" would represent the majority of their constituents and cast their vote according to the majority, again of their constituents. What I see is the rich voting for what ever they want, because they are the only ones that can be elected, and no one is representing the average American regardless of what party he belongs. Both the Democratic and Republican parties have lost touch with us and neither party represents the main stream American.

Answer 4

It is so easy for one side or the other but, no! Many of us are radical in that we are fed up with staged elections and the hood winking that gets worse and worse. Sick of the lies, the double talk and sheep in the US who do vote without knowing a thing except the latest spin. And others who didn't vote and are the vilest of ranters.
Tired, yes, resigned, NO, if being a radical is what it takes to get any action that's what I am.

Answer 5

no i support the issues of both sides i am pro life and for drilling for oil but i am for legalized drugs and gay marriage .i want to down size government and build nuclear plants .
I want care taken in preventing the polution of the enviroment .
I want to develop solar and renewable energy programs and am against all war and a tiny military and weapons budget

I support gun ownership but want those who have guns to pass a written exam on our constitution .THIS way they will know when the use of force is proper against an oppressive government or invasion.
I want to eliminate property taxes and also fund projects that fully employ all people who want to work with a minimum wage in place that allows for people to meet all the bills and have some savings .I do not want to reverse engineer the wage so that you are trapped in a job and life-style .
MInimum wage is designed to feed you house you and work you with no benefits at all and does not allow for ownership of anything .
I insist on fair treatmrent of all people including the deviants and would like to see all religions taught so we may all become a more spiritual nation and not be divided by religion .I beleif in a creator but defineing his motives and plans is beyond man .
EXCEPT that caring and doing for others makes you feel good and being selfish leads only to more selfishness .AND it seems all things are based on a simple yet complex formula that holds the universe together.

Answer 6

I agree that they used to have actual agendas but now they all depend on the polls to much. I seriously believe it is one party and everything we see and hear is scripted in advance. They are the puppet masters and we are just dancing on the ends of the strings that they pull. They know it and they laugh at us every single night while they dine at Washington's finest restaurants.

Answer 7

it's a falacy to think each political party has 1 position on any issue. There may be more divergence within each party, than between the perceived views of each party.

Consider - there may be more concensus between John McCain & Joe Lieberman than between John McCain & Bill Frist. There may also be more concensus between John McCain & Jon Corzine, than between Jon Corzine & Ted Kennedy.

Answer 8

People are getting stranger and stranger. These days most people are willing to accept almost any way of life. This allows all the freaks to really blossom and become politicians.