2006-08-14 05:07:41 · 16 answers · asked by Olivia 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
libertarians
What is a libertarian you ask? those who are for personal freedoms, they are (for the most part) conservative fiscally speaking.
check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarians
2006-08-14 05:10:39 · answer #1 · answered by Eli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The American people. Our leader just tell us they are for small government to appeal to the masses. Its all a lie. Look how big the government is today with all the new bureaucracy put in place after 9/11. Its all BS. If you hear what you want to hear over and over again you will believe. They brain wash us with TV and propaganda on both sides. The government is very smart and they do not want American having independent thought, so they keep us scared and tell us that they will protect us while at the same time taking away our civil liberties with the Patriot Act. Its a slow proccess but soon they will make us powerless and then we will be in serious Shi*. Just my opionion I could be wrong and everything is just hunky dory, I guess time will tell
2006-08-14 05:16:39 · answer #2 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Libertarians and Constitutionalists seem to be. Maybe I belong there...
To the second answer up there: The last Democratic President to believe in limited government was Grover Cleveland, in the late 19th century. Every Dem since then has expanded the federal government, or tried to.
2006-08-14 05:14:27 · answer #3 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Libertarians, Constitution Party.
2006-08-14 05:11:31 · answer #4 · answered by Mel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives are for small government. Not those 'compassionate' ones like Dubya, but the conservative conservatives, like ME!
Yes, the Libertarians are also. So, too are the Constitution party people.
2006-08-14 05:36:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion everyone is going for his and her own agenda and it is about time our country learns how to unite and work as a team.We can change our causes of two wars and reduce the National deficit as well as Global Warming instead of divided the party lines.It is about time We all need each other to survive and prepare our children off debts in the future generation.
2006-08-14 05:23:51 · answer #6 · answered by ryladie99 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it rather is for stable reason. smart human beings are not arguing approximately length of government, yet over what, precisely, government ought to or shouldn't do. people who think of, working example, slashing each little thing are morons that don't care if slashing necessary centers kills or maims thousands and thousands of individuals. it rather is not any longer approximately length, yet approximately functionality: ward off the wealthy and useful from screwing every physique else over (stealing our money, poisoning us, etc.); furnish necessary centers and courses we could no longer have in any different case (working example, if all study is employer-funded, then ALL is barely achieved to make the wealthy richer, and none of it on issues that ought to be researched; and the wealthy very own all of the advantages of study -- for this reason, government ought to fund slightly prognosis). smart, effectual government is stable; no government, or idiotic or pointless government are undesirable. it rather is purely no longer approximately length.
2016-12-14 05:39:53 · answer #7 · answered by nurdin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Green Party ? And yes I do Believe Jim W's .."pal" Ralph Nader would shrink the federal Government.
Who is Jim W..?
2006-08-14 05:16:22 · answer #8 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jim W and his pall Ralph Nader
Go big Red Go
2006-08-14 05:11:41 · answer #9 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrats are 4 smaller government despite what you have been bull-sheeted into believing.
2006-08-14 05:11:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋