Look, bush would've never benefitted from bin laden if he hadn't been appointed by the supreme court in 2000. If not for bin laden's help he would've ended up totally dejected by his country and would've ended up like poppy bush, a one termer. He and his administration ceased on the "power of fear" and have continued ruling in this fashion ever since.
So for the next two years we'll continue to hear nonsensical phrases such as: "I'm the decider", "don't come bother us, or we'll kill you". "wanted: dead or alive" and of course the most absurd one: "fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice ummm, you can't fool me again!" That's your prez!!!
2006-08-14 05:07:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by liberalthinktank 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
the place have you ever been for the final 10 years ? because whilst can one state circulate into yet another united states of america and basically around up human beings and then delivery them to a diverse united states of america and carry them there without combating foot right into a courtroom whilst replaced into that element of worldwide regulation whilst the Iraq conflict first began the human beings have been given instruction that Saddam replaced into having dinner at a cafe in down city Baghdad so as that they dropped 4 X 2000 pound bombs on it, is that no longer against the Geneva convention to bomb a community you be conscious of would be populated by utilising civilians, can we see everyone being indited for crimes against humanity is everyone charged with conflict crimes ? Saddam is a Prisoner of conflict held by utilising the human beings, to kill or enable a prisoner to be killed or attainable them over to any team or state that would kill them is against the Geneva convention however the human beings did it and no one protests or condemns them for it, that's how the recent international is people who've would are top in in spite of they do
2016-09-29 06:20:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is no more terra card as you put it,. then along that line.,..Why have an active military? we won! Why not get rid of the DHS? Low marks? I havent seen where we had a recent attack on his watch at a port or port.
2006-08-14 05:59:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If it were not for "terra" he would have been a one-termer,just like his dolt father.I'm not sure he can play the terror card anymore,Iraq's fiasco being what it is.It SHOULDN'T be,give his incompetence,and they way his supporters spin everything.
1-Bush declared a pre-emptive strike against a country unrelated to 9-11 in response to 9-11.
2-Bush later admits he did this based on false intelligence.
3-Rather that pull out in light of this knowledge,he does nothing but repeats his "stay the course" mantra.
1+2+3=Grounds for Impeachment.
If he were a Democrat,he'd be impeached by now.
2006-08-14 04:40:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Excuse me, but did you know your head is stuck up your ***?
I'm so sorry that my avatar offends you. John Kerry offends me with his anti-Americanism and waffling cowardice.
Any and everything the administration does to keep America safe is b*tched at by liberals.
2006-08-14 05:47:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He would be handling the policies he wanted to institute prior to 9/11..like cleaning up the mess the Dems have turned SS into!! Plus all the other things he was elected for prior to....
2006-08-14 04:43:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by bereal1 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Pulling weeds in TX.
2006-08-14 04:41:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Waas up 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
He'd be sitting on his ranch in Texas working on his memoirs.
Wait...Isn't that what he was doing last week?
2006-08-14 04:41:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
He would be discussing "social issued 'n' stuff" with the liberals.maybe even hug a tree or two.
2006-08-14 04:48:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
He'd be a single barrel idiot rather than a double barreled one!
2006-08-14 04:47:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
1⤊
2⤋