Was the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 assisted by supplementary demolition?

Question

...or was it really only the airplanes and the fuel? Or is there any way to really tell at this point?

Answer 1

Yes, true, according to this scientifically proved documentry.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change

Answer 2

Not the towers. It was pretty clear in the tapes how they fell. Large sections where taken out by the planes. The planes essentially divided each tower into 2 buildings. one on top of the crash and one on the bottom. The top "building" couldn't be supported and fell down onto the bottom "bulding" which collapsed domino style (both towers). This was plain physics.

Those that claim that demolition charges were planted have to answer this question: The demolition charges had to be at the level of the crash site. Why didn't the planes take out the charges?

BUILDING 7 IS ANOTHER STORY.

This is clearly a planned demolition. View the video here:
http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html

You can see that the center caves in first. Also, mysteriously,none of the tapes have audio in the beginning when you would hear the charges go off.

Answer 3

It was only the airplanes and the fuel. The conspiracy theorists believe that they see charges being blown as the buildings go down. These are not demolition charges. The cause for the bursts coming from the window is the fact the it IS falling down. When a skyscraper comes down like that, theres tons and tons of metal and rock falling on the floors below. The bursts you see in those videos are the rooms filling up with dust and debris, and then blowing the windows. nothing else.

Answer 4

I don't know where your picking up this idea at all! I was a firefighter in a large city for thirty years and have seen thousands of people injured and die. There is no way in hell these circumstances could have been cordinated to present such a succesful demise of the two towers! I went there! 10,000 gallons of fuel definetly weakend the steel structure to fail. Once the top floors commenced to collapse, the hammered effect compromised the structures integrity to support itself. It was an unbeleivable successful tragedy. Even better than they expected! Remember that when our sons/daughters over- react in War.

Answer 5

thats bs that people say that the US government would that. I watched a show about the fires after the planes hit and it cleary showed that the building supports were burned and weekend until they collasped. As for tower 7 there's no way thats a planned demolition where's the explosion sound of the bombs?
besides do you really think someone would run in plant a bunch of explosives after what happened to the towers

Answer 6

Please -- read the books - watch the documentaries. Why on earth do you think "supplementary demolition" was needed to bring them down?
Two huge airplanes - fully loaded with jet fuel - a building constructed with no interior stabilization... You take out the shell, burn it to hell, and down come the towers - along with over 3,000 innocent people.

Answer 7

Well build a building with blocks and knock it from the top, where does it fall.
It certainly does not cave into itself into the ground like the towers did.
That is why I question what really happened.
For a building to crash from bottom up wouldn't it have to have started toward
the bottom?
things that make you go hMMMMM>

Answer 8

i don't think the government had a hand in it but i could be wrong ,i do think they where on high terror alert .but would not letting the people know make for a worst scenario or have been for the better.,and the flash they talk about before impact, been a rocket fired from the plane

Answer 9

You just HAVE to be kidding, right? Supplementary demolition? I guess ppl just love whacko conspiracy theories.

Answer 10

I believe it was built to collapse on itself, but only to prevent other buildings surrounding it from being destroyed.