Isn’t he the same guy who glared at the CIA briefer and snapped, 'All right, you’ve covered your ***' on Aug. 6, 2001 and did nothing when the CIA tried to warn him that "Bin Laden was Determined to Strike in the U.S.?” It was his watch and he was responsible to protect the US Citizens, but he decided that his vacation was more important thus Bin Laden was successful on Sep. 11, 2001.
So why is he trying to act like a National Security hero now?
2006-08-14 04:15:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chris S: He didn't take the blame for 9/11 or the London Subway bombings so why is he taking credit for this now?
2006-08-14 05:16:17 · update #1
He's using everything he can for poltical gain,in an election year,when 2 out of 3 people disagree with his job performance.
It's shameless,really.
2006-08-14 04:39:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
The United States and our allies are working TOGETHER on intelligence to thwart any future attacks.
If Bill Clinton would have done his job we would have had Osama. Seems like that's the President you should be so upset with. Bush is doing everything he can.
Have the terrorists done anything on US soil since 9/11. Who do you think gets CREDIT for that? YES - it is GWB AND our allies.
2006-08-14 11:38:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
So you want to give him the blame for a successful attack, but not the credit for a thwarted one? Sounds like a partisan rant to me. Call back when you're ready to look at things in a more objective manner.
2006-08-14 11:22:46 · answer #3 · answered by Chris S 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
He's like the kid in grade school who always took credit for someone elses good deed, except not as intelligent.
Here's a treat for ya; http://servercc.oakton.edu/~billtong/bnsp/presidunce.jpg
2006-08-14 11:52:37 · answer #4 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
grow up
2006-08-14 11:20:52 · answer #5 · answered by sam21462 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋