Better? worse? chaos? Out of their completly?
If you want to tell someone dissapointed with Bush things will get better here's your chance.
2006-08-14 03:34:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You can bet that the ongoing war in Iraq will be one of the biggest issues in the 2008 presidential elections, and almost certainly in the 2012 elections as well.
I very much doubt that we'll be out of there by 2008, let alone a year from now, and I think there's a strong chance we'll still be there in massive numbers in 2012, particularly as I can't imagine why else we'd be building those permanent bases.
I think it's a safe bet that there won't be a pro-American Iraqi democratically-elected government there anytime in the next decade, but at the same time I don't think that the current level of violence will continue unabated.
The bottom line, I think, is that the administration put us into an unwinnable situation. If we do withdraw there will certainly not be a democratic government there anytime soon, and those who pushed for withdrawal will be blamed for that. If we do not withdraw, we may be able to prop up a token semi-democratic government there, but not one that will support our remaining there in the long run, and not one that will be able to independently police the country to prevent sectarian violence.
Right now the Republicans' best hope is to manage to pin the failure on their opponents, and my best guess is that is what will happen: we will eventually concede the obvious, and withdraw. The removal of U.S. forces will result in a period of even worse violence, followed by some kind of ongoing sectarian battle there. The Republicans will successfully blame our failure on the Democrats who called for the withdrawal. In short, the party that has its way on the issue will wind up being the party that takes the blame. To a significant extent, at least, many of the Democrats - those who voted to support the attack on Iraq - will be getting exactly what they deserve. The time to act was late 2002 and early 2003, to prevent Bush from making this tragic mistake.
2006-08-14 03:50:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you have the numbers of murdered and or mentally broken below Saddam, the numbers tortured and scared for all times, finished villages gassed and what on the subject of the conflict lifeless from the Iran/Iraq conflict. how lots of the listed deaths resulted from IED's located by utilising Iraqis or different radical Muslims? i believe you experience you provided a reliable argument and that i'm on no account helping dying, yet you may look on the completed photograph, no longer in elementary terms the products that help your ideals.
2016-12-17 10:34:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A full-scale civil war, with all U.S forces out by May 2007, and the Civil War reaching it's height in June 2007
2006-08-14 03:49:07 · answer #3 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully, Impeachment Trials will be commencing for Bush, He would have been forced to mellow down and stop threatening the world, The Shiittes and Sunnis would be in full rage at each other and a strongman will come through to take over where the puppet administartion has failed. Remember we can not export 'democracy' to those who do not want it.
2006-08-14 03:53:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
the same is it looks now .THE worlld community will not let us pull out now that we are in without having to pay billions of dollars in war reperations .
SO we are stuck till the economy and people are in the same condition or better.
ITS like we are doomed no matter what at this point and this is why war is never the option on the table unless we are attacked by more then just a group of terrorists .
NO direct link was established between saddam (EVIL MURDERER) and bin laudin. INfact ,they, i believe are enemy's of one another .
2006-08-14 03:42:37 · answer #5 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Chaos. Tension will rise. And conflicts will affect Americas economy badly due to Oil and some Natural Gases.
2006-08-14 03:40:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well since Iran is planning to "light up the sky over Jerusalem" on Aug 22nd it is up in the air at this point. If they succeed then we are probably looking at WW4. Then it will be millions of Muslims against the free world, or at least those who do not want to submit to Allah.
2006-08-14 04:14:02 · answer #7 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will depend on the up coming election, if the democrats are able to over come the repuglican hate machine and take back one or both of the houses then maybe we will be near withdrawing from Iraq. Bush and his scare tactics has about run its course I think, at least I hope.
2006-08-14 03:40:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully better, but you never know. We definitely stepped into a can of worms over there. Should've left Saddam alone. Iran is the real threat.
2006-08-14 06:38:18 · answer #9 · answered by Vincent Valentine 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no idea hun ime a bit more woried about what the uk will be like in 2007 with all these terrorists over here now our government (planks the lot of em) have decided to lower our alert stage
2006-08-14 03:40:23 · answer #10 · answered by rachel 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋