Personally? I wouldn't trade the life I've had for anything in the world. Several class awards way back in H/S -- among them "Most friends" -- and I was out to most everyone at the time. Loved what I did for the first few years thereafter, although it made barely enough money to live on. Now, good and extensive education, good job. Quite a bit of good sex, though mostly with straight bois, when I was young, and now a partner for the last [almost] 15 years. We are a successful couple, active in the community, in our faith communities (liberal Christian here, Wiccan from an organized congregation for Jonathan), in politics, and in charity work. Fun hobbies. Huge number of friends.
What else can I say - I really wouldn't trade the life I'm having for any other life, and if I weren't gay, I wouldn't have it. Yes, gay really is ok. It fact, gay is wonderful.
Peace,
Reynolds
http://www.rebuff.org
believeinyou24@yahoo.com
PS To Casey and Woffy:
from an old e-mail:
"Subject: The Bible and its teachings
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from you, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other specific Biblical laws and how to follow them.
a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanness (Lev.15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. If I come into contact with a woman who is menstruating and she doesn't tell me until afterwards, must I kill her immediately or can I just beat her?
d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? Also, is Sabbath on Saturday as Seventh Day Adventists claim (Christians, like us...or are they?) or is it on Sunday as Baptists and some other faiths agree? I am beset by not knowing who to kill and when to kill them...please clarify this for me.
f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality (Lev. 18:22). I don't agree. I'm also confused about how homosexuality can be an abomination when Jonathan and David were married in the Bible (1 Samuel 18:1, 3 - 4). Here, I'll quote it - "And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul. And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword and to his bow and to his girdle." and also Ruth's relationship with Naomi is suspect, (Ruth 1:16-17) "And Ruth said to Naomi, Entreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God: Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the Lord do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part three and me." Can you settle this?
g) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27 and even though 1st Cor. 11:4-6 says that it is a shame upon a man to have long hair. How should they die?
i) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? Also, since it is strictly forbidden to "eat neither fat nor blood" in Lev. 3:17 & Lev. 19:26, does that mean that I must be a vegetarian and must I smite those who choose to eat meat?
j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them (Lev.24:10-16)? Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws (Lev. 20:14)?
k) I know that it is an abomination for a man to wear a woman's clothes or a woman to wear a man's (Deut. 22:5), so does that mean that since my wife borrowed my boxers once, she's going to hell?
l) An unbeliever sent me an email telling me that God is an ABORTIONIST? It says, "In Num. 5:11-31, God commands a husband to get an abortion for his wife if he suspects she has been impregnated by another man. A priest is to make her drink a potion and tell her, "If any man other than your husband has had intercourse with you, may the LORD make an example of you . . . by bringing upon you miscarriage and untimely birth." To deliberately cause a miscarriage is to perform an abortion. And who brings about this miscarriage? Who performs this abortion? It is the LORD who does so. God is an abortionist. In Ex. 21:22-25, God tells us what to do if a man who is fighting knocks against a pregnant woman. If the woman dies, the principle of "life for life" is invoked and the man responsible for her death must be killed. If she lives but has a miscarriage, then the death of the fetus is to be compensated for by the payment of a fine, as demanded by the woman's husband. Thus, God has revealed the status of the unborn fetus: it is not an independent, full-fledged human life, whose destruction amounts to murder. It is a thing owned by the woman's husband, a thing whose loss, like that of any other thing, may be compensated for with money." How can this be true?
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging and also for the reassurance that the Bible is infallible."
And from me -- the Bible is myth -- get over yourselves.
2006-08-14 03:45:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Of course, don't let anyone say anything different. By the way, I admire the questions you ask.. I always like to challenge people and make them think too.
People need to start thinking for themselves instead of pointing to a bible, book, religion or believing (without questioning) something that someone told them.
I have several gay couple friends... they are wonderful human beings and can never imagine that the love they have for each other would be considered "wrong".
2006-08-14 03:56:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by spike_is_my_evil_vampire 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
We tried to commence a GSA at my intense college one 12 months. there have been the two 3 or 4 human beings (the representatives, i assume) that talked to our crucial approximately beginning one. I propose, we actually in simple terms sat down and defined why we mandatory one, how many human beings we could instructed which could have an interest and overjoyed to have one, and stuff like that. We even had a petition, in simple terms common scholars signed the petition announcing they theory it may be super to have a GSA. regardless of if, our city is hick-ish and backwards, so the crucial declined our request. i think of in case you do some thing alongside the strains of what we did, your college ought to have a GSA very directly... as long as its not an extremely-conservative, united states bumpkin-crammed city. Oh, and gay is unquestionably effective. there is that maxim that asserts you may in basic terms be your self... so be!
2016-10-02 01:40:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For me as a person i think it wrong. I also think i have no right tyo tell someone else how to live. Plus i used to hang out with some guys who are gay and i feel safe around them for i know they won't pull anything naghty.
2006-08-14 06:41:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, gay is okay. Most of gay people I know, they are great to be with, and I have a close friend since college who is gay, he's awesome, no dull moments.
2006-08-14 03:36:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dawn Treader 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Gay is the way I am and is very ok. A lot of gay people are the nicest I've ever met
2006-08-14 03:26:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I was in the closet for a long time, but since I came out, I found my family,friends and coworkers have been very accepting.
2006-08-14 03:39:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by redcatt63 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
That's what I want to know. There are so many against it makes you wonder. I think a lot are against it because of religion but to others thats just the excuse they use. Maybe we will never know for sure, there's bound to always be some against it.
2006-08-14 03:26:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by homosceptic 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think in todays world it's safe for you to come out of the closet without fear of too much reprisals.
2006-08-14 10:01:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by asterisk_dot_asterisk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't want it. Denied it. Despaired about it.
Gradually accepted it. It got better. Learning every day about it.
2006-08-14 03:46:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Think.for.your.self 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
to some it's a love game, but to others it's about reproduction. creating a perfect community with a man and a women. our society looks too much at religion and what they beleive should be, that they don't realize true happiness.
2006-08-14 03:40:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by ooh la la 1
·
0⤊
2⤋