The papers say Paul sent correspondence admonishing Heather for taking three bottles of cleaning products in order to tidy up her nearby office.
?!
To me, this suggests something else operating here, and this is what I think it is: Those three bottles of product may have been receptacles for valuables -- you know, those so-called safes disguised as packages of shave-cream, coffee, or cleaning supplies.
So what Heather really took were three bottles that appear to be household products but, in fact, were stashes of valuables.
Think?
2006-08-14 03:00:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Never thought of that. But here is what his lawyer is probably thinking.
Paul you let her take 3 bottles of cleaning items what next food and maybe a chair.
It has to stop Mate here and now.
At least this is what I am thinking "Give someone an inch and they take a foot"
2006-08-14 03:16:45 · answer #1 · answered by mick987g 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds plausible to me. I wonder what she stole. We know he wouldn't care about cleaning products. He wouldn't even miss them.
2006-08-14 11:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by rachelframecory 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow! i never would have thought that! all i was imagining was that sir paul was a mean, tight-fisted old man
2006-08-14 10:08:28 · answer #3 · answered by Echo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe but who really cares?????
2006-08-14 10:05:03 · answer #4 · answered by ♥OHIO*HONEY♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋