Do you wish Artists would imagine Art that has more 'rightness'?

Question

Jason B, the fact that you do not know what it is could indicate that you have not seen to omuch of it in art. It is something you would know when you see it.

Your right Jason B, I suppose it was silly putting a question like that.
I know what i would like to see in Art but i forget sometimes that other people are not able to see the same things

the best i can tell you (without trying to show you which I cant on here) is easthetic rightness

Answer 1

What is rightness?

Well you can't ask if it should have more rightness without defining your interpretation of rightness. Rightness is an arbitrary thing depending on the beleifs of the person defining it.

Answer 2

aesthetic "rightness" is not yours to define - first of all, only time will tell if a piece of art is good. After trends fade and pop critics are dead, then a piece of art can be viewed without prejudice. So.....unless you are an artist and you are judging your own work, your question is comepletely invalid. Secondly, even the merest hint of trying to insist that an artist should follow someone else's idea of what is aesthetically "right" smacks of censorship, and I really don't need to tell you why you don't want to go there, now do I? Perhaps a follow-up question to yours should be "Do you wish that people who try to define art would go and get degrees in Art and Art History in order to understand what they are looking at?" Just as a brain surgeon needs some education, so do art critics.

Answer 3

Rightness can be flexible depending on what the artist is trying to show in their work.

Answer 4

If you could be more specific about what you want to see in art, people could be more helpful.
Is "rightness" moral or philosophical?
Asthetic?
Religious?

Answer 5

You still didn't define it. Can't answer your question, sorry.