As hispanic women do tend to have more children than whites..the ABORTION rate is 63%
white.... now my question to you is is it worst to have a child at a young age? or is it better to get pregnant at a young age and just kill the fetus...as white women seam to have no problem doing that?
check it out http://www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/phil%20115/Stats_on_abortion.htm
2006-08-13 18:26:08 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
It's worse to kill a human... A Human doesn't start living once it's out, its starts living once the seed and the egg unite to form one..... who are the real criminals??
2006-08-13 19:25:55 · answer #1 · answered by sly 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
I do not think that having children at any age would be an issue if the economy was not being maipulated.
The manipulation of the economy has influenced decisions of any potential parent. Options related to not having children are economy related. If one is very wealthy, and decides to have 10 children, there is no issuse.
The economic manipulators have influenced societal norms and perspectives for their gain. Our ability to raise competent children has been corrupted by a society with a lopsided view.
It seems to be healthier for women to have children at a younger age, since having them for the first time at an age greater than 30 makes them high risk.
Freedom of Choice is a serious matter in that it indicates that one must be informed and responsible. Abortion and childbirth is also serious and requires resposibility, information, and reason. It also requires CA$H money! More by proportion than in the past when the breadwinner was usually one person. Nowadays 2 people are struggling more than the one person was in the past and are barely breaking even.
I wonder how Depression Era people made it. Up until the 1970's a family with 4 children was considered a small family. The 1970's is when machines were upscaled and the need for Human labor was reduced. There were machines to run machines. The improvement of machine technolgy changed the workplace, the homeplace; and the communities and institutions associated with them.
Planned Parenthood on its surface seems like a benign organization looking to provide options to having so many babies. The reality might be population control. They were active in eugenics movement in the 1900's which sought to sterilize certain "undesirable" groups.
2006-08-14 02:16:49 · answer #2 · answered by LeBlanc 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The key is just being responsible for your own actions no matter what color your skin is. If you can't control yourself, maybe you should be forced to be on the shot.
By the way, my mom and dad were in high school when I was born and even though my dad wasn't around (he passed in a car accident right after I was born) my mom was able to be responsible for me and never went on assistance (welfare, wic, or food stamps) ever. The only help she got was the whopping $100/month Social Security check for me for my dad dying. I think she might have got financial aid with her college tuition, but that's all. I think that there are worse things than to have a child at a young age, but it call comes down to whether the person is willing to step up to the plate and take care of the kid that they made. If you're not, abortion may be the option because these girls are clearly not interested in the adoption route. I don't think they're willing to make the sacrifices for their babies like my mom made for me.
2006-08-14 01:30:48 · answer #3 · answered by Kris B 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Amazing. Steering a path between racist and anti-choice bigotries, while carefully including both. And how interesting that Ron gets a capital and kate does not. Could that be saying something about your regard for women, Ronnie? Kate, are you allowed an opinion?
2006-08-14 01:35:22 · answer #4 · answered by mlamb56 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think it is wrong to have a lot of children and not be able to take care of them and the state has to. Then they are taking money out of my pocket and cutting my children off. So white, brown,black, green with pockadots dose not matter if you can not support them you do not need them.
2006-08-14 01:47:53 · answer #5 · answered by usserydog 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None of the above. It is better to get pregnant AFTER you are financially able to support children and AFTER you figure out how a child will fit into your life, and AFTER you have decided you are truly adult enough to raise a child in a manner that will allow that child to become a decent adult.
Abortion is MURDER, it is NEVER the right thing to do.
AND, your question is RACIST. Are you a Democrat? They usually are the first to play the race card.
2006-08-14 01:34:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am going to say you a a kid playing on a computer way past your bedtime!
By your sentence structure(lack thereof) and spelling I get the impression you have no idea what you are trying to talk about.
Exactly how was this an immigration issue?
2006-08-14 03:08:49 · answer #7 · answered by cmeand3 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You need to articulate better. O_o I can hardly understand you.
I believe everyone should have the right to choose those things for themselves, morally right or not; No one should be forced to do anything, because THAT is immoral.
If that answers your question. D:
2006-08-14 01:31:07 · answer #8 · answered by Jingle 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why do you have to related it to race? The thing is women should decide what they do with an unborn ball of cells, not the government.
2006-08-14 03:31:46 · answer #9 · answered by RATM 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here, I have a question for you. What does this have to do with immigration? This is about morality, which has no place in this category. It is her choice, and hers alone. She is the one who ultimately pays for her decision.
2006-08-14 01:48:46 · answer #10 · answered by Ricky 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I say kill the fetus befor it gets old enough to be raped by a mexican and have to have an abortion!
2006-08-14 01:31:50 · answer #11 · answered by old dude 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋